These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24236555)

  • 1. Unresolved tensions in consumer engagement in CER: a US research perspective.
    Workman T; Maurer M; Carman K
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Mar; 2(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 24236555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
    Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with Electronic Clinical Data: a perspective from the EDM forum.
    Holve E; Segal C; Hamilton Lopez M
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S11-8. PubMed ID: 22692252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Principles for planning and conducting comparative effectiveness research.
    Luce BR; Drummond MF; Dubois RW; Neumann PJ; Jönsson B; Siebert U; Schwartz JS
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):431-40. PubMed ID: 24236420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research.
    Kreis J; Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Dickersin K
    Health Expect; 2013 Dec; 16(4):323-37. PubMed ID: 22390732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A conceptual model of the multiple stages of communication necessary to support patient-centered care.
    Halley MC; Rendle KA; Frosch DL
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jul; 2(4):421-33. PubMed ID: 24236683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure.
    Tunis SR; Benner J; McClellan M
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1963-76. PubMed ID: 20564311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public perceptions of comparative effectiveness research and use of evidence in healthcare decision-making.
    Cornwell D; Hu M; Esposito D
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):623-34. PubMed ID: 25494569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Building academic health centers' capacity to shape and respond to comparative effectiveness research policy.
    VanLare JM; Conway PH; Rowe JW
    Acad Med; 2011 Jun; 86(6):689-94. PubMed ID: 21512371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards Building a Bridge between Community Engagement in Research (CEnR) and Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
    Ahmed SM; Nelson D; Kissack A; Franco Z; Whittle J; Kotchen T; Meurer JR; Morzinski J; Brandenburg T
    Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Apr; 8(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 25441215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating values and consumer involvement in guidelines with the patient at the center: article 8 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Kelson M; Akl EA; Bastian H; Cluzeau F; Curtis JR; Guyatt G; Montori VM; Oliver S; Schünemann HJ;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):262-8. PubMed ID: 23256169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating collaborations in comparative effectiveness research: opportunities and challenges for social network analysis.
    Zickafoose JS; Kimmey LD; Tomas A; Esposito D; Rich E
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):667-75. PubMed ID: 25494573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postscript: research agenda to guide the next generation of public reports for consumers.
    Damberg CL; McNamara P
    Med Care Res Rev; 2014 Oct; 71(5 Suppl):97S-107S. PubMed ID: 24860123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating economic evaluation methods into clinical and translational science award consortium comparative effectiveness educational goals.
    Iribarne A; Easterwood R; Russo MJ; Wang YC
    Acad Med; 2011 Jun; 86(6):701-5. PubMed ID: 21512372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissemination and implementation of comparative effectiveness evidence: key informant interviews with Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions.
    Morrato EH; Concannon TW; Meissner P; Shah ND; Turner BJ
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Mar; 2(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 24236560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The implications of comparative effectiveness research for academic medicine.
    Rich EC; Bonham AC; Kirch DG
    Acad Med; 2011 Jun; 86(6):684-8. PubMed ID: 21512362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER).
    Holve E; Segal C; Lopez MH; Rein A; Johnson BH
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S7-10. PubMed ID: 22692262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing health information technology's role in enabling comparative effectiveness research.
    Navathe AS; Conway PH
    Am J Manag Care; 2010 Dec; 16(12 Suppl HIT):SP44-7. PubMed ID: 21314220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.