These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24236558)

  • 1. Study design elements for rigorous quasi-experimental comparative effectiveness research.
    Maciejewski ML; Curtis LH; Dowd B
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Mar; 2(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 24236558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A translation table for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research: guidance to improve the value of research for clinical and health policy decision-making.
    Tunis SR; Messner DA; Mohr P; Gliklich RE; Dubois RW
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 24237407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
    Sox HC; Goodman SN
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matching study designs to disability-related comparative effectiveness research questions.
    Ballou J; Rich E; Kehn M
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jan; 2(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 24236522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using comparative effectiveness research to remedy health disparities.
    Kupersmith J; LaBarca D
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Mar; 3(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 24645691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An integrated evidence rating to frame comparative effectiveness assessments for decision makers.
    Ollendorf DA; Pearson SD
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S145-52. PubMed ID: 20473206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research.
    Chalkidou K; Tunis S; Whicher D; Fowler R; Zwarenstein M
    Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):436-46. PubMed ID: 22752634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.
    Dreyer NA; Tunis SR; Berger M; Ollendorf D; Mattox P; Gliklich R
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1818-25. PubMed ID: 20921481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximizing the clinical utility of comparative effectiveness research.
    Umscheid CA
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Dec; 88(6):876-9. PubMed ID: 20962776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effectiveness research in oncology methodology: observational data.
    Hershman DL; Wright JD
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4215-22. PubMed ID: 23071228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Lies, damned lies ..." and observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.
    Albert RK
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 187(11):1173-7. PubMed ID: 23725614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies.
    Horn SD; DeJong G; Deutscher D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S127-37. PubMed ID: 22840879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological challenges of comparative effectiveness research in pain: implications for investigators, clinicians, and policy makers.
    Bellows BK; Biskupiak J
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2011; 25(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21882980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological issues in comparative effectiveness research: clinical trials.
    Peduzzi P; Kyriakides T; O'Connor TZ; Guarino P; Warren SR; Huang GD
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e8-15. PubMed ID: 21184867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interrupted time series design: a useful approach for studying interventions targeting participation.
    Anaby D; Lal S; Huszczynski J; Maich J; Rogers J; Law M
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2014 Nov; 34(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 24328671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Report outlines best practices in patient-centered outcomes research.
    Wallis L
    Am J Nurs; 2014 Feb; 114(2):16. PubMed ID: 24481351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
    Sox HC
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.
    Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC
    Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Structured Preapproval and Postapproval Comparative Study Design Framework to Generate Valid and Transparent Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Decisions.
    Gatto NM; Reynolds RF; Campbell UB
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2019 Jul; 106(1):103-115. PubMed ID: 31025311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.