BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24236796)

  • 1. Oncology training programs: are we doing comparative effectiveness research justice?
    Zaorsky NG; Showalter TN
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Nov; 2(6):573-82. PubMed ID: 24236796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invited article: comparative effectiveness research, evidence-based medicine, and the AAN.
    French JA; England JD
    Neurology; 2010 Aug; 75(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 20697109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pathology milestones and the next accreditation system.
    Naritoku WY; Alexander CB; Bennett BD; Black-Schaffer WS; Brissette MD; Grimes MM; Hoffman RD; Hunt JL; Iezzoni JC; Johnson R; Kozel J; Mendoza RM; Post MD; Powell SZ; Procop GW; Steinberg JJ; Thorsen LM; Nestler SP
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Mar; 138(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 24576024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
    Hahn OM; Schilsky RL
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4194-201. PubMed ID: 23071239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.
    Basch E; Abernethy AP; Mullins CD; Reeve BB; Smith ML; Coons SJ; Sloan J; Wenzel K; Chauhan C; Eppard W; Frank ES; Lipscomb J; Raymond SA; Spencer M; Tunis S
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4249-55. PubMed ID: 23071244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The implications of comparative effectiveness research for academic medicine.
    Rich EC; Bonham AC; Kirch DG
    Acad Med; 2011 Jun; 86(6):684-8. PubMed ID: 21512362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative-effectiveness research: does it matter?
    Cohen JP
    Clin Ther; 2013 Apr; 35(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 23523048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
    Sox HC
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Competency-based goals, objectives, and linked evaluations for rheumatology training programs: a standardized template of learning activities from the Carolinas Fellows Collaborative.
    Criscione-Schreiber LG; Bolster MB; Jonas BL; O'Rourke KS
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2013 Jun; 65(6):846-53. PubMed ID: 23281313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The past, present, and future of comparative effectiveness research in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.
    Kupersmith J; Ommaya AK
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e3-7. PubMed ID: 21184864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative effectiveness research through the looking glass.
    Levy A; Harrigan B; Johnston K; Briggs A
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(6):NP6-8. PubMed ID: 19959806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Concato J; Lawler EV; Lew RA; Gaziano JM; Aslan M; Huang GD
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. PubMed ID: 21184862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical education and training in gynecologic oncology I: European perspective.
    Cibula D; Kesic V
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2 Suppl):S52-5. PubMed ID: 19573708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative effectiveness research: opportunities in surgical oncology.
    Neuman HB; Greenberg CC
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24314341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative effectiveness research: moving medical oncology forward.
    Hirsch BR; Zafar SY
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 24314342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program model.
    Huang GD; Ferguson RE; Peduzzi PN; O'Leary TJ
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e24-31. PubMed ID: 21184863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of demographics, motivations, and backgrounds among applicants to the integrated 0 + 5 vascular surgery residency.
    Lee JT; Teshome M; de Virgilio C; Ishaque B; Qiu M; Dalman RL
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 51(2):496-502; discussion 502-3. PubMed ID: 20022205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews.
    Guise JM; Viswanathan M
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Dec; 90(6):876-82. PubMed ID: 22048219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graduate education and training in surgical oncology.
    Hill GJ
    J Cancer Educ; 1986; 1(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 3274933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.