These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24236913)

  • 1. Posterior parietal cortex is critical for the encoding, consolidation, and retrieval of a memory that guides attention for learning.
    Schiffino FL; Zhou V; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 39(4):640-9. PubMed ID: 24236913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Secondary visual cortex is critical to the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability in rats.
    Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 44(2):1870-7. PubMed ID: 27225533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consolidation of altered associability information by amygdala central nucleus.
    Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Sep; 133():204-213. PubMed ID: 27427328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mini-review: Prediction errors, attention and associative learning.
    Holland PC; Schiffino FL
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 May; 131():207-15. PubMed ID: 26948122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dorsolateral striatum is critical for the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability.
    Asem JS; Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 42(5):2203-13. PubMed ID: 26108257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of amygdala central nucleus in feature negative discriminations.
    Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 126(5):670-80. PubMed ID: 22889308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different roles for amygdala central nucleus and substantia innominata in the surprise-induced enhancement of learning.
    Holland PC; Gallagher M
    J Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 26(14):3791-7. PubMed ID: 16597732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of reward timing information on cue associability are mediated by amygdala central nucleus.
    Wheeler DS; Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 125(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21319887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blocking and associability change.
    Jones PM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jul; 39(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 23668185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporally limited role of substantia nigra-central amygdala connections in surprise-induced enhancement of learning.
    Lee HJ; Youn JM; Gallagher M; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 27(11):3043-9. PubMed ID: 18588542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociation of attention in learning and action: effects of lesions of the amygdala central nucleus, medial prefrontal cortex, and posterior parietal cortex.
    Maddux JM; Kerfoot EC; Chatterjee S; Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 121(1):63-79. PubMed ID: 17324051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learned changes in outcome associability.
    Quigley MC; Eatherington CJ; Haselgrove M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):209-221. PubMed ID: 28627301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory spatial discriminatory and mnemonic neurons in rat posterior parietal cortex.
    Nakamura K
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Nov; 82(5):2503-17. PubMed ID: 10561422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The posterior parietal cortex and long-term memory representation of spatial information.
    Kesner RP
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2009 Feb; 91(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 18835456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on unblocking.
    Chang SE; McDannald MA; Wheeler DS; Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 126(2):279-89. PubMed ID: 22448857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic changes in parietal activation during encoding: implications for human learning and memory.
    Elman JA; Rosner ZA; Cohn-Sheehy BI; Cerreta AG; Shimamura AP
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 82():44-52. PubMed ID: 23732887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unifying network model links recency and central tendency biases in working memory.
    Boboeva V; Pezzotta A; Clopath C; Akrami A
    Elife; 2024 Apr; 12():. PubMed ID: 38656279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amygdalo-striatal interaction in the enhancement of stimulus salience in associative learning.
    Esber GR; Torres-Tristani K; Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 129(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 25730120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parietal Representations of Stimulus Features Are Amplified during Memory Retrieval and Flexibly Aligned with Top-Down Goals.
    Favila SE; Samide R; Sweigart SC; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(36):7809-7821. PubMed ID: 30054390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surprise-induced enhancements in the associability of Pavlovian cues facilitate learning across behavior systems.
    Márquez I; Loewinger G; Vargas JP; López JC; Díaz E; Esber GR
    Behav Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 136(4):285-292. PubMed ID: 35175064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.