BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24237249)

  • 1. Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: a physics-based model of mass-induced fuel consumption.
    Kim HC; Wallington TJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Dec; 47(24):14358-66. PubMed ID: 24237249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life Cycle Assessment of Vehicle Lightweighting: Novel Mathematical Methods to Estimate Use-Phase Fuel Consumption.
    Kim HC; Wallington TJ; Sullivan JL; Keoleian GA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(16):10209-16. PubMed ID: 26168234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life Cycle Assessment of Vehicle Lightweighting: A Physics-Based Model To Estimate Use-Phase Fuel Consumption of Electrified Vehicles.
    Kim HC; Wallington TJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 50(20):11226-11233. PubMed ID: 27533735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission benefits of lightweighting in automobiles: review and harmonization.
    Kim HC; Wallington TJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jun; 47(12):6089-97. PubMed ID: 23668335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of the Fuel Saving, Life Cycle GHG Emission, and Ownership Cost Impacts of Lightweighting Vehicles with Different Powertrains.
    Luk JM; Kim HC; De Kleine R; Wallington TJ; MacLean HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Aug; 51(15):8215-8228. PubMed ID: 28714678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impacts of Vehicle Weight Reduction via Material Substitution on Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
    Kelly JC; Sullivan JL; Burnham A; Elgowainy A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12535-42. PubMed ID: 26393414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards.
    Jenn A; Azevedo IM; Michalek JJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 50(5):2165-74. PubMed ID: 26867100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Dynamic Fleet Model of U.S Light-Duty Vehicle Lightweighting and Associated Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 2016 to 2050.
    Milovanoff A; Kim HC; De Kleine R; Wallington TJ; Posen ID; MacLean HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Feb; 53(4):2199-2208. PubMed ID: 30682256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.
    MacLean HL; Lave LB; Lankey R; Joshi S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1769-79. PubMed ID: 11288305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.
    Challa R; Kamath D; Anctil A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114592. PubMed ID: 35121453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Green Principles for Vehicle Lightweighting.
    Lewis GM; Buchanan CA; Jhaveri KD; Sullivan JL; Kelly JC; Das S; Taub AI; Keoleian GA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Apr; 53(8):4063-4077. PubMed ID: 30892881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regional Heterogeneity in the Emissions Benefits of Electrified and Lightweighted Light-Duty Vehicles.
    Wu D; Guo F; Field FR; De Kleine RD; Kim HC; Wallington TJ; Kirchain RE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 53(18):10560-10570. PubMed ID: 31336049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic and environmental benefits of higher-octane gasoline.
    Speth RL; Chow EW; Malina R; Barrett SR; Heywood JB; Green WH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jun; 48(12):6561-8. PubMed ID: 24870412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Energy-saving and emission-reduction potential of fuel cell heavy-duty trucks in China during the fuel life cycle.
    Yan R; Jiang Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(33):80559-80572. PubMed ID: 37296253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.
    Gan Y; Lu Z; He X; Hao C; Wang Y; Cai H; Wang M; Elgowainy A; Przesmitzki S; Bouchard J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):6944-6956. PubMed ID: 33945267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Greenhouse Gas and Noxious Emissions from Dual Fuel Diesel and Natural Gas Heavy Goods Vehicles.
    Stettler ME; Midgley WJ; Swanson JJ; Cebon D; Boies AM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(4):2018-26. PubMed ID: 26757000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consideration of black carbon and primary organic carbon emissions in life-cycle analysis of Greenhouse gas emissions of vehicle systems and fuels.
    Cai H; Wang MQ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):12445-53. PubMed ID: 25259852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of ethanol on vehicle energy efficiency and implications on ethanol life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis.
    Yan X; Inderwildi OR; King DA; Boies AM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jun; 47(11):5535-44. PubMed ID: 23627549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tailpipe emissions from gasoline direct injection (GDI) and port fuel injection (PFI) vehicles at both low and high ambient temperatures.
    Zhu R; Hu J; Bao X; He L; Lai Y; Zu L; Li Y; Su S
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Sep; 216():223-234. PubMed ID: 27267738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unregulated greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from current technology heavy-duty vehicles.
    Thiruvengadam A; Besch M; Carder D; Oshinuga A; Pasek R; Hogo H; Gautam M
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Nov; 66(11):1045-1060. PubMed ID: 26950051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.