These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24237407)

  • 1. A translation table for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research: guidance to improve the value of research for clinical and health policy decision-making.
    Tunis SR; Messner DA; Mohr P; Gliklich RE; Dubois RW
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 24237407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which design for which question? An exploration toward a translation table for comparative effectiveness research.
    Montori VM; Kim SP; Guyatt GH; Shah ND
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 24237408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research.
    Gazelle GS; Kessler L; Lee DW; McGinn T; Menzin J; Neumann PJ; van Amerongen D; White LA;
    Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):692-8. PubMed ID: 22095993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matching study designs to disability-related comparative effectiveness research questions.
    Ballou J; Rich E; Kehn M
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jan; 2(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 24236522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological challenges of comparative effectiveness research in pain: implications for investigators, clinicians, and policy makers.
    Bellows BK; Biskupiak J
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2011; 25(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21882980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From comparative effectiveness research to patient-centered outcomes research: policy history and future directions.
    D'Arcy LP; Rich EC
    Neurosurg Focus; 2012 Jul; 33(1):E7. PubMed ID: 22746239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative effectiveness research: a view from the other side of the pond.
    Rawlins MD
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):293-5. PubMed ID: 24237410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The patient-centered outcomes research institute should focus on high-impact problems that can be solved quickly.
    Sox H
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Oct; 31(10):2176-82. PubMed ID: 23048093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological recommendations for comparative research on the treatment of chronic wounds.
    Sonnad SS; Goldsack JC; Mohr P; Tunis S
    J Wound Care; 2013 Sep; 22(9):470-80. PubMed ID: 24005781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute can best influence real-world health care decision making.
    Garber AM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Dec; 30(12):2243-51. PubMed ID: 22147851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The preliminary draft of the methodology report by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute].
    Schmiemann G
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(7):496-9. PubMed ID: 22981026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-Centered Research into Outcomes Stroke Patients Prefer and Effectiveness Research: Implementing the patient-driven research paradigm to aid decision making in stroke care.
    Xian Y; O'Brien EC; Fonarow GC; Olson DM; Schwamm LH; Hannah D; Lindholm B; Maisch L; Lytle BL; Greiner MA; Wu J; Peterson ED; Pencina MJ; Hernandez AF
    Am Heart J; 2015 Jul; 170(1):36-45, 45.e1-11. PubMed ID: 26093862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating stakeholder perspectives in developing a translation table framework for comparative effectiveness research.
    Gliklich RE; Leavy MB; Velentgas P; Dreyer NA; Tunis SR; Mohr P; Messner DA; Moloney RM; Karkare SU; Dubois RW; Graff JS
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 May; 1(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 24237409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrated evidence rating to frame comparative effectiveness assessments for decision makers.
    Ollendorf DA; Pearson SD
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S145-52. PubMed ID: 20473206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
    Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating new approaches for clinical development: translational research and relative effectiveness.
    Lehner JP; Epstein RS; Salimi T
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Jan; 1(1 Suppl):15-21. PubMed ID: 24237318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Atkins D; Chang SM; Gartlehner G; Buckley DI; Whitlock EP; Berliner E; Matchar D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1198-207. PubMed ID: 21463926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using health technology assessment to identify gaps in evidence and inform study design for comparative effectiveness research.
    Tunis SR; Turkelson C
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4256-61. PubMed ID: 23071248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.