141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24237729)
1. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance phantom for digital dental imaging.
Mah P; McDavid WD; Dove SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):632-9. PubMed ID: 21862364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology.
Gonzalez L; Vano E; Fernandez R; Ziraldo V; Delgado J; Delgado V; Moro J; Ubeda C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22232776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is digital better in dental radiography?
Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.
Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A comparative study of analog and digital intraoral x-ray image detector systems].
Blendl C; Stengel C; Zdunczyk S
Rofo; 2000 Jun; 172(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 10916550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvements in image quality after optimization in digital intraoral radiographs.
Barrineau AB; Mah P; Mallya SM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2023 Jan; 154(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 36402578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.
Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10808219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of physical properties of different digital intraoral sensors.
Al-Rawi W; Teich S
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34(8):e76-83. PubMed ID: 24568289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
Fauber TL
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film.
Ludlow J; Mol A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
Doyle P; Finney L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.
Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U
Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 11203933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assurance tests for digital radiography in general dental practice.
Greenall C; Drage N; Ager M
Dent Update; 2014 Mar; 41(2):126-8, 131-4. PubMed ID: 24783881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
Bhaskaran V; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE; Worthington HV; Horner K
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 16104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Criteria for the assessment of intrinsic performances of digital radiographic intraoral sensors.
Mondou D; Bonnet E; Coudert JL; Jourlin M; Molteni R; Pachod V
Acad Radiol; 1996 Sep; 3(9):751-7. PubMed ID: 8883516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the reproducibility of the gray values and noise of a direct digital radiography system.
Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Teixeira RC; Capelozza AL; Rubira-Bullen IR
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26017488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
