248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24238297)
1. The impact of genomic variability on gene expression in environmental Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Treu L; Toniolo C; Nadai C; Sardu A; Giacomini A; Corich V; Campanaro S
Environ Microbiol; 2014 May; 16(5):1378-97. PubMed ID: 24238297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oxidative stress response and nitrogen utilization are strongly variable in Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains with different fermentation performances.
Treu L; Campanaro S; Nadai C; Toniolo C; Nardi T; Giacomini A; Valle G; Blondin B; Corich V
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 May; 98(9):4119-35. PubMed ID: 24695828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative genome analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain.
Borneman AR; Forgan AH; Pretorius IS; Chambers PJ
FEMS Yeast Res; 2008 Nov; 8(7):1185-95. PubMed ID: 18778279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under Chinese rice wine fermentation.
Li Y; Zhang W; Zheng D; Zhou Z; Yu W; Zhang L; Feng L; Liang X; Guan W; Zhou J; Chen J; Lin Z
Genome Biol Evol; 2014 Sep; 6(9):2516-26. PubMed ID: 25212861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of fermentation and enzyme expression profiles among industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Uebayashi K; Shimizu H; Matsuda F
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Aug; 102(16):7071-7081. PubMed ID: 29882163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microarray karyotyping of commercial wine yeast strains reveals shared, as well as unique, genomic signatures.
Dunn B; Levine RP; Sherlock G
BMC Genomics; 2005 Apr; 6():53. PubMed ID: 15833139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative genomics of wild type yeast strains unveils important genome diversity.
Carreto L; Eiriz MF; Gomes AC; Pereira PM; Schuller D; Santos MA
BMC Genomics; 2008 Nov; 9():524. PubMed ID: 18983662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Saccharomyces cerevisiae vineyard strains have different nitrogen requirements that affect their fermentation performances.
Lemos Junior WJF; Viel A; Bovo B; Carlot M; Giacomini A; Corich V
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2017 Nov; 65(5):381-387. PubMed ID: 28862747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative analysis of wine yeast gene expression profiles under winemaking conditions.
Varela C; Cárdenas J; Melo F; Agosin E
Yeast; 2005 Apr; 22(5):369-83. PubMed ID: 15806604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural yeast promoter variants reveal epistasis in the generation of transcriptional-mediated noise and its potential benefit in stressful conditions.
Liu J; Martin-Yken H; Bigey F; Dequin S; François JM; Capp JP
Genome Biol Evol; 2015 Mar; 7(4):969-84. PubMed ID: 25762217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. RNAseq-based transcriptome comparison of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from diverse fermentative environments.
Ibáñez C; Pérez-Torrado R; Morard M; Toft C; Barrio E; Querol A
Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 257():262-270. PubMed ID: 28711856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Borneman AR; Desany BA; Riches D; Affourtit JP; Forgan AH; Pretorius IS; Egholm M; Chambers PJ
PLoS Genet; 2011 Feb; 7(2):e1001287. PubMed ID: 21304888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole Genome Comparison Reveals High Levels of Inbreeding and Strain Redundancy Across the Spectrum of Commercial Wine Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Borneman AR; Forgan AH; Kolouchova R; Fraser JA; Schmidt SA
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Apr; 6(4):957-71. PubMed ID: 26869621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The genetic structure of fermentative vineyard-associated Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations revealed by microsatellite analysis.
Schuller D; Casal M
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2007 Feb; 91(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 17094015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic variability and physiological traits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from "Vale dos Vinhedos" vineyards reflect agricultural practices and history of this Brazilian wet subtropical area.
Crosato G; Carlot M; De Iseppi A; Garavaglia J; Pinto LMN; Ziegler DR; Ramos RCS; Rossi RC; Nadai C; Giacomini A; Corich V
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jul; 34(8):105. PubMed ID: 29971504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from must of grape grown in experimental vineyard.
Cappello MS; Bleve G; Grieco F; Dellaglio F; Zacheo G
J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(6):1274-80. PubMed ID: 15546418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biodiversity of Saccharomyces yeast strains from grape berries of wine-producing areas using starter commercial yeasts.
Valero E; Cambon B; Schuller D; Casal M; Dequin S
FEMS Yeast Res; 2007 Mar; 7(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 17040482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic and phenotypic comparison between similar wine yeast strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from different geographic origins.
Salinas F; Mandaković D; Urzua U; Massera A; Miras S; Combina M; Ganga MA; Martínez C
J Appl Microbiol; 2010 May; 108(5):1850-8. PubMed ID: 20163487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Remanence and survival of commercial yeast in different ecological niches of the vineyard.
Cordero-Bueso G; Arroyo T; Serrano A; Valero E
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2011 Aug; 77(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 21545464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118.
Novo M; Bigey F; Beyne E; Galeote V; Gavory F; Mallet S; Cambon B; Legras JL; Wincker P; Casaregola S; Dequin S
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Sep; 106(38):16333-8. PubMed ID: 19805302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
