218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24238322)
1. Understanding the direction of bias in studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
Kohn MA; Carpenter CR; Newman TB
Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1194-206. PubMed ID: 24238322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Biases in diagnostic test studies: impact on estimating sensitivity and specificity].
Rendón-Macías ME; Valenzuela M; Villasís-Keever MÁ
Rev Alerg Mex; 2020; 67(2):165-173. PubMed ID: 32892530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recognising bias in studies of diagnostic tests part 2: interpreting and verifying the index test.
Kea B; Hall MK; Wang R
Emerg Med J; 2019 Aug; 36(8):501-505. PubMed ID: 31221671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recognising Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests Part 1: Patient Selection.
Hall MK; Kea B; Wang R
Emerg Med J; 2019 Jul; 36(7):431-434. PubMed ID: 31302605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.
Karch A; Koch A; Zapf A; Zerr I; Karch A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():73-82. PubMed ID: 27107877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Verification bias in pediatric studies evaluating diagnostic tests.
Bates AS; Margolis PA; Evans AT
J Pediatr; 1993 Apr; 122(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 8463905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 12762453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Studies of diagnostic test accuracy: Partial verification bias and test result-based sampling.
Kohn MA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 May; 145():179-182. PubMed ID: 35124189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports.
Mower WR
Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Jan; 33(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 9867892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of bias on the results of diagnostic studies of carpal tunnel syndrome.
Boyer K; Wies J; Turkelson CM
J Hand Surg Am; 2009; 34(6):1006-13. PubMed ID: 19446966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correcting for partial verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies: A tutorial using R.
Arifin WN; Yusof UK
Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(9):1709-1727. PubMed ID: 35043447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Verification and classification bias interactions in diagnostic test accuracy studies for fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Schmidt RL; Walker BS; Cohen MB
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Mar; 123(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 25521425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
Walsh T
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Classification, direction, and prevention of bias in epidemiologic research.
Choi BC; Noseworthy AL
J Occup Med; 1992 Mar; 34(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 1545278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosing intramammary infection: Controlling misclassification bias in longitudinal udder health studies.
Haine D; Dohoo I; Scholl D; Dufour S
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Feb; 150():162-167. PubMed ID: 29169686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
