These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24238322)

  • 21. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
    Valenstein PN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitivity and specificity of a single diagnostic test in the presence of work-up bias.
    Choi BC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1992 Jun; 45(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 1607897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards.
    Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; van Smeden M; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Aug; 159(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23922065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Methodological bias and variation of systematic reviews on diagnostic test accuracy].
    Li ZX; Yang ZR; Xiang X; Gao P; Shu Z; Huang YS; Cao Y; Sun F; Zhan SY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 37(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 26917532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
    Alonzo TA
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Method of cut point selection biases diagnostic research.
    Ewald B
    Intern Med J; 2008 Jul; 38(7):615; author reply 615-6. PubMed ID: 18715315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis.
    Leeflang MM; Bossuyt PM; Irwig L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 18778913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing diagnostic accuracy and the clinical value of positron emission tomography imaging in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SNAP).
    Kymes SM; Lee K; Fletcher JW;
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 16539088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adjusting for partial verification or workup bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Brophy J; Joseph L; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 175(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 22422923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
    de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating medical diagnostic tests at the subunit level in the presence of verification bias.
    Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2161-76. PubMed ID: 12820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Radiology: How to Recognize and Address Potential Sources of Bias.
    Pavlou A; Kurtz RM; Song JW
    Radiol Res Pract; 2021; 2021():5801662. PubMed ID: 34532141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rational use of diagnostic tests for clinical decision making.
    Buehler AM; Ascef BO; Oliveira Júnior HA; Ferri CP; Fernandes JG
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2019 Mar; 65(3):452-459. PubMed ID: 30994847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
    Chassé M; Fergusson DA
    Semin Nucl Med; 2019 Mar; 49(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 30819399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
    Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
    Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing sensitivity and specificity of medical imaging tests when verification bias is present: The concept of relative diagnostic accuracy.
    Filleron T
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():32-35. PubMed ID: 29279167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A hierarchical outcomes approach to test assessment.
    Pearl WS
    Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Jan; 33(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 9867891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.