82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24238449)
21. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with two different rotary systems followed by a self-adjusting file.
Cakici F; Cakici EB; Küçükekenci FF
Int J Artif Organs; 2016 Feb; 39(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 26953903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The self-adjusting file (SAF) system: An evidence-based update.
Metzger Z
J Conserv Dent; 2014 Sep; 17(5):401-19. PubMed ID: 25298639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dentinal damage and fracture resistance of oval roots prepared with single-file systems using different kinematics.
Abou El Nasr HM; Abd El Kader KG
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 24862715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Post-instrumentation pain after the use of either Mtwo or the SAF system: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Saumya-Rajesh P; Krithikadatta J; Velmurugan N; Sooriaprakas C
Int Endod J; 2017 Aug; 50(8):750-760. PubMed ID: 27662605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The self-adjusting file instrumentation results in less debris extrusion apically when compared to WaveOne and ProTaper NEXT.
Pawar AM; Pawar MG; Metzger Z; Kokate SR
J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 25829683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Meant to make a difference, the clinical experience of minimally invasive endodontics with the self-adjusting file system in India.
Pawar AM; Pawar MG; Kokate SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 25307918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dentinal Microcrack Development after Canal Preparation: A Longitudinal in Situ Micro-computed Tomography Study Using a Cadaver Model.
De-Deus G; César de Azevedo Carvalhal J; Belladonna FG; Silva EJNL; Lopes RT; Moreira Filho RE; Souza EM; Provenzano JC; Versiani MA
J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1553-1558. PubMed ID: 28735793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative evaluation of stress distribution against the root canal wall at three different levels using novel NiTi rotary files - A finite element analysis.
Singh R; Dubey S; Singh P; Samant PS; Saha SG
J Conserv Dent Endod; 2024 Jan; 27(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 38389738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Dentinal Defects Formation in Straight, Moderate and Severely Curved Canals by Three Distinctive Nickel Titanium Instruments: An
Alasvand Javadi A; Jafarzadeh M; Yazdizadeh M; Askari Hasanvand N; Nikoo Nejad S; Amiri A
J Dent (Shiraz); 2023 Sep; 24(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 37727362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of minimally invasive file systems on resistance to fracture using traditional and contracted access cavity designs in the maxillary first and second molars.
Kapadia KH; Patni PM; Jain P; Raghuvanshi S; Pandey SH; Singhal RR
J Conserv Dent Endod; 2023; 26(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 37705550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Micro-Computed Tomographic Assessment of Microcrack Formation before and after Instrumentation of Curved Root Canals with Neoniti Rotary Files.
Zarean P; Özcan M; Zarean P; Haghani SO; Jahromi MZ; Al-Haj Husain N; Khabiri M
Materials (Basel); 2022 Apr; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 35591336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evolution and development: engine-driven endodontic rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Liang Y; Yue L
Int J Oral Sci; 2022 Feb; 14(1):12. PubMed ID: 35181648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold, One Curve, and Self-Adjusting File systems in severely curved canals: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Singla MG; Kumar H; Satija R
J Conserv Dent; 2021; 24(3):271-277. PubMed ID: 35035153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An
Bakthavatchalam B; Ranjani MS; Amudhalakshmi K
Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(3):542-547. PubMed ID: 32308334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dentinal defects induced by 6 different endodontic files when used for oval root canals: an
Pawar AM; Thakur B; Kfir A; Kim HC
Restor Dent Endod; 2019 Aug; 44(3):e31. PubMed ID: 31485427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Screw-In Forces during Movement of Endodontic Files with Different Geometries, Alloys, and Kinetics.
Kwak SW; Lee CJ; Kim SK; Kim HC; Ha JH
Materials (Basel); 2019 May; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 31072071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Force and vibration correlation analysis in the self-adjusting file during root canal shaping: An in-vitro study.
Nayak A; Kankar PK; Jain N; Jain PK
J Dent Sci; 2018 Sep; 13(3):184-189. PubMed ID: 30895119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The geometric effect of an off-centered cross-section on nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A finite element analysis study.
Ha JH; Kwak SW; Versluis A; Lee CJ; Park SH; Kim HC
J Dent Sci; 2017 Jun; 12(2):173-178. PubMed ID: 30895044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of remaining dentin thickness and fracture resistance of conventional and conservative access and biomechanical preparation in molars using cone-beam computed tomography: An
Makati D; Shah NC; Brave D; Singh Rathore VP; Bhadra D; Dedania MS
J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(3):324-327. PubMed ID: 29899638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
