320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24239036)
1. [Factors predicting unsuccessful labor induction with dinoprostone in post-term pregnancy with unfavorable cervix].
Ducarme G; Chesnoy V; Petit L
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Jan; 44(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 24239036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Obesity and cervical ripening failure risk.
Gauthier T; Mazeau S; Dalmay F; Eyraud JL; Catalan C; Marin B; Aubard Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Mar; 25(3):304-7. PubMed ID: 21574901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Double-balloon device and intravaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in women with unfavourable cervix].
Letailleur M; Mathieu N; Dietrich G; Lethuilier C; Verspyck E; Marpeau L
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Jun; 43(6):424-30. PubMed ID: 25943409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Tenore JL
Am Fam Physician; 2003 May; 67(10):2123-8. PubMed ID: 12776961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure of cervical ripening with prostaglandin-E2 can it be predicted?
Melamed N; Ben-Haroush A; Kremer S; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jun; 23(6):536-40. PubMed ID: 19895355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 187(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 12388961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cervical maturation by repeated applications of prostaglandin E2 gel. 186 cases].
Panel P; Bascou V; de Meeus JB; Magnin G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 9265064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.
Williams MC; Krammer J; O'Brien WF
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 9351765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women].
Oliveira TA; Melo EM; Aquino MM; Mariani Neto C
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 33(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 21829994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in cervical nitric oxide concentration correlate with Bishop score and cervical length modifications in prostaglandin E2-mediated induction of labor.
Chiossi G; Verocchi G; Venturini P; Facchinetti F
J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2006 Apr; 13(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 16638591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas.
Al-Taani MI
East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):547-53. PubMed ID: 16335645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Induction of labor in women with oligohydramnios.
Venturini P; Contu G; Mazza V; Facchinetti F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Feb; 17(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 16076620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.
Park KH; Kim SN; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Jung HJ; Oh KJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21484904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.
Suffecool K; Rosenn BM; Kam S; Mushi J; Foroutan J; Herrera K
J Perinat Med; 2014 Mar; 42(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 24096438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of efficacy for cervical ripening among the Bishop score criteria in nulliparous women at term.
Ducarme G; Berthommier L; Planche L
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 161(3):934-941. PubMed ID: 36426906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications].
Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Krŭsteva K; Nashar S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
