These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24239036)

  • 1. [Factors predicting unsuccessful labor induction with dinoprostone in post-term pregnancy with unfavorable cervix].
    Ducarme G; Chesnoy V; Petit L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Jan; 44(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 24239036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
    Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obesity and cervical ripening failure risk.
    Gauthier T; Mazeau S; Dalmay F; Eyraud JL; Catalan C; Marin B; Aubard Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Mar; 25(3):304-7. PubMed ID: 21574901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Double-balloon device and intravaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in women with unfavourable cervix].
    Letailleur M; Mathieu N; Dietrich G; Lethuilier C; Verspyck E; Marpeau L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Jun; 43(6):424-30. PubMed ID: 25943409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Tenore JL
    Am Fam Physician; 2003 May; 67(10):2123-8. PubMed ID: 12776961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failure of cervical ripening with prostaglandin-E2 can it be predicted?
    Melamed N; Ben-Haroush A; Kremer S; Hod M; Yogev Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jun; 23(6):536-40. PubMed ID: 19895355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 187(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 12388961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
    Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cervical maturation by repeated applications of prostaglandin E2 gel. 186 cases].
    Panel P; Bascou V; de Meeus JB; Magnin G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 9265064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.
    Williams MC; Krammer J; O'Brien WF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 9351765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
    Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Efficacy of dinoprostone and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women].
    Oliveira TA; Melo EM; Aquino MM; Mariani Neto C
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 33(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 21829994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in cervical nitric oxide concentration correlate with Bishop score and cervical length modifications in prostaglandin E2-mediated induction of labor.
    Chiossi G; Verocchi G; Venturini P; Facchinetti F
    J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2006 Apr; 13(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 16638591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas.
    Al-Taani MI
    East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):547-53. PubMed ID: 16335645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induction of labor in women with oligohydramnios.
    Venturini P; Contu G; Mazza V; Facchinetti F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Feb; 17(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 16076620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.
    Park KH; Kim SN; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Jung HJ; Oh KJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21484904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.
    Suffecool K; Rosenn BM; Kam S; Mushi J; Foroutan J; Herrera K
    J Perinat Med; 2014 Mar; 42(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 24096438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of efficacy for cervical ripening among the Bishop score criteria in nulliparous women at term.
    Ducarme G; Berthommier L; Planche L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 161(3):934-941. PubMed ID: 36426906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications].
    Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Krŭsteva K; Nashar S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.