These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2423977)

  • 41. Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environment.
    Tandri H; Zviman MM; Wedan SR; Lloyd T; Berger RD; Halperin H
    Heart Rhythm; 2008 Mar; 5(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 18313607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Noise reversion of a dual chamber pacemaker without noise.
    Fröhlig G; Dyckmans J; Doenecke P; Sen S; Bette L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Sep; 9(5):690-6. PubMed ID: 2429275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reliability of electromagnetic filters of cardiac pacemakers tested by cellular telephone ringing.
    Trigano A; Blandeau O; Dale C; Wong MF; Wiart J
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Aug; 2(8):837-41. PubMed ID: 16051120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Transcatheter radiofrequency ablation of atrial tissue using a suction catheter.
    Lavergne T; Prunier L; Cuize L; Bruneval P; Von Euw D; Le Heuzey JY; Peronneau P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan; 12(1 Pt 2):177-86. PubMed ID: 2466251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at 1.5-tesla.
    Shellock FG; Fischer L; Fieno DS
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 17178677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of pacemaker pulse generator and patient longevity in patients aged 1 day to 20 years.
    Serwer GA; Mericle JM
    Am J Cardiol; 1987 Apr; 59(8):824-7. PubMed ID: 3825943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Usefulness of transcutaneous triggering of conventional implanted pulse generators by an activity-sensing pacemaker for predicting effectiveness of rate response pacing.
    Fetter J; Benditt DG; Mianulli M
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Nov; 62(13):901-5. PubMed ID: 3177238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Multiprogrammable pacemakers: are their advantages fully employed?
    Novák M; Smola M; Tosovský J
    Int J Artif Organs; 1989 Oct; 12(10):655-8. PubMed ID: 2807591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Phantom pacemaker programming.
    Fieldman A; Dobrow RJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1978 Apr; 1(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 83629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging?
    Irnich W; Irnich B; Bartsch C; Stertmann WA; Gufler H; Weiler G
    Europace; 2005 Jul; 7(4):353-65. PubMed ID: 15944094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Runaway pulse generator malfunction resulting from undetected battery depletion.
    Vijayaraman P; Vaidya K; Kim SG; Gross JN; Ferrick KJ; Palma E; Furman S; Fisher JD
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Feb; 25(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 11915992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pure atrial-based lower rate timing of dual chamber pacemakers: implications for upper rate limitation.
    Barold SS; Fredman CS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Mar; 18(3 Pt 1):391-400. PubMed ID: 7770358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cardiac pacemaker: in vitro assessment at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Fieno DS; Thomson LJ; Talavage TM; Berman DS
    Am Heart J; 2006 Feb; 151(2):436-43. PubMed ID: 16442911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial: rationale, design, results, clinical implications and lessons for future trials.
    Wilkoff BL;
    Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 15071277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations.
    Sommer T; Naehle CP; Yang A; Zeijlemaker V; Hackenbroch M; Schmiedel A; Meyer C; Strach K; Skowasch D; Vahlhaus C; Litt H; Schild H
    Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 16966587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on cardiac pacemakers and its safety in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers.
    Cooper D; Wilkoff B; Masterson M; Castle L; Belco K; Simmons T; Morant V; Streem S; Maloney J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 1):1607-16. PubMed ID: 2462246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The patient alert system--pilot study of built-in warning systems for pacemakers.
    Fahraeus T; Stotts L; Prutchi D; Maertens S; Woodson D; Cooke D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):256-9. PubMed ID: 9474683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An open volume, high isolation, radio frequency surface coil system for pulsed magnetic resonance.
    Curto CA; Placidi G; Sotgiu A; Alecci M
    J Magn Reson; 2004 Dec; 171(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 15546763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Electrocardiographic manifestations of a dual-chamber, rate-modulated (DDDR) pacemaker.
    Hayes DL; Higano ST; Eisinger G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Apr; 12(4 Pt 1):555-62. PubMed ID: 2470037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A unique pulse generator safety feature for bipolar lead fracture.
    Mauser JF; Huang SK; Risser T; Bonavita GJ; Wagshal AB; Mittleman RS; Cuello C
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jul; 16(7 Pt 1):1368-72. PubMed ID: 7689201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.