These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24240484)

  • 21. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison between open and mini-open approaches with two years follow-up.
    Zairi F; Arikat A; Allaoui M; Assaker R
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2013 May; 74(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 23307308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer-assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better Than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
    Tian W; Xu YF; Liu B; Liu YJ; He D; Yuan Q; Lang Z; Han XG
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):237-242. PubMed ID: 28632545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
    Brodano GB; Martikos K; Lolli F; Gasbarrini A; Cioni A; Bandiera S; Silvestre MD; Boriani S; Greggi T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E559-64. PubMed ID: 24136060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.
    Virdee JS; Nadig A; Anagnostopoulos G; George KJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 31(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 27331649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [A feasibility research of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral incision and hybrid internal fixation for dural-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Xu J; Mao K; Wang Y; Xiao S; Li P; Mao K; Xiao B; Wang Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 27(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 24171350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcomes comparing minimally invasive with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Chen YC; Zhang L; Li EN; Ding LX; Zhang GA; Hou Y; Yuan W
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(43):e17420. PubMed ID: 31651845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Gu G; Zhang H; Fan G; He S; Meng X; Gu X; Yan N; Guan X
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Aug; 24(8):1640-8. PubMed ID: 26002354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].
    Zeng ZL; Jia L; Yu Y; Xu W; Hu X; Zhan XH; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 55(4):279-284. PubMed ID: 28355766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shen X; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; Zhou X; He S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1612-6. PubMed ID: 24814852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Complications and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of one- or two-level degenerative disc diseases of the lumbar spine in patients older than 65 years.
    Wu WJ; Liang Y; Zhang XK; Cao P; Zheng T
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Jul; 125(14):2505-10. PubMed ID: 22882930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Fan G; Wu X; Yu S; Sun Q; Guan X; Zhang H; Gu X; He S
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9540298. PubMed ID: 27747244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Li F; Li C; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Wang H; Yu Y; Cheng L
    BMC Surg; 2020 May; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32398125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Shunwu F; Xing Z; Fengdong Z; Xiangqian F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(17):1615-20. PubMed ID: 20479702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience.
    Schizas C; Tzinieris N; Tsiridis E; Kosmopoulos V
    Int Orthop; 2009 Dec; 33(6):1683-8. PubMed ID: 19023571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kulkarni AG; Bohra H; Dhruv A; Sarraf A; Bassi A; Patil VM
    Indian J Orthop; 2016 Sep; 50(5):464-472. PubMed ID: 27746487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
    Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.