These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24242966)

  • 1. Enhancing debate about the sexes.
    Wilkinson D
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):721. PubMed ID: 24242966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual dimorphism and human enhancement.
    Casal P
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):722-8. PubMed ID: 22962068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What's wrong with enhancements?
    Temkin LS
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):729-31. PubMed ID: 23143997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moderate eugenics and human enhancement.
    Selgelid MJ
    Med Health Care Philos; 2014 Feb; 17(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 23728949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancement and the ethics of development.
    Buchanan A
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2008 Mar; 18(1):1-34. PubMed ID: 18561576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancement and human nature: the case of Sandel.
    Lewens T
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):354-6. PubMed ID: 19482977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The search for perfection.
    Harris J; Shakespeare T; Phillips K; Bruce D
    New Sci; 2002 May; 174(2342):52-4. PubMed ID: 12408144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The case against perfection: what's wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering.
    Sandel MJ
    Atl Mon; 2004 Apr; 292(3):50-4, 56-60, 62. PubMed ID: 15468473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioethics and Transhumanism.
    Porter A
    J Med Philos; 2017 Jun; 42(3):237-260. PubMed ID: 28499043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexism and human enhancement.
    Sparrow R
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):732-5. PubMed ID: 23975952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human vs. posthuman.
    Bostrum N
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2007; 37(5):4-5; author reply 5-6. PubMed ID: 17969254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human vs. posthuman.
    Hughes J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2007; 37(5):4; author reply 5-6. PubMed ID: 17966828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imagining the future.
    Levin Y
    New Atlantis; 2004; 4():48-65. PubMed ID: 15586965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Authenticity and ambivalence: toward understanding the enhancement debate.
    Parens E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):34-41. PubMed ID: 16092400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical issues in enhancement technologies.
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2010 Jun; 20(2):vii-viii. PubMed ID: 20653247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics for the pediatrician: a brave new pediatrics? Managing the desire for better children through biotechnological enhancement.
    Antiel RM; Jacobson RM; Fischer PR
    Pediatr Rev; 2012 Feb; 33(2):e13-7. PubMed ID: 22301037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reform, not destroy: reply to McMahan, Sparrow and Temkin.
    Casal P
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):741-2. PubMed ID: 24242967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic modification of characteristic masculine traits: enhancement or deformity?
    McMahan J
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):736-40. PubMed ID: 24068076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethics for the pediatrician: the persuasion of enhancements in pediatrics.
    Yates FD
    Pediatr Rev; 2010 May; 31(5):216-8. PubMed ID: 20435714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The question of disability in the post-human debate. Critical remarks.
    Gatti C
    Cuad Bioet; 2014; 25(85):445-56. PubMed ID: 25684383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.