These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24242967)
1. Reform, not destroy: reply to McMahan, Sparrow and Temkin. Casal P J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):741-2. PubMed ID: 24242967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What's wrong with enhancements? Temkin LS J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):729-31. PubMed ID: 23143997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexism and human enhancement. Sparrow R J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):732-5. PubMed ID: 23975952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic modification of characteristic masculine traits: enhancement or deformity? McMahan J J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):736-40. PubMed ID: 24068076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual dimorphism and human enhancement. Casal P J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):722-8. PubMed ID: 22962068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sparrows, hedgehogs and castrati: reflections on gender and enhancement. Harris J J Med Ethics; 2011 May; 37(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 21508191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sparrow's song revisited. Harris J J Med Ethics; 2012 Jan; 38(1):8. PubMed ID: 21947812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioethical consensus and the force of good ideas. Evans JH Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):3. PubMed ID: 16092381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Harris, harmed states, and sexed bodies. Sparrow R J Med Ethics; 2011 May; 37(5):276-9. PubMed ID: 21508192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Authenticity and ambivalence: toward understanding the enhancement debate. Parens E Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):34-41. PubMed ID: 16092400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fear of a female planet: how John Harris came to endorse eugenic social engineering. Sparrow R J Med Ethics; 2012 Jan; 38(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 21785160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imagining the future. Levin Y New Atlantis; 2004; 4():48-65. PubMed ID: 15586965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A reply to critics of Creation Ethics. DeGrazia D J Med Ethics; 2015 May; 41(5):423-4. PubMed ID: 25691666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancement and human nature: the case of Sandel. Lewens T J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):354-6. PubMed ID: 19482977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reversal test: eliminating status quo bias in applied ethics. Bostrom N; Ord T Ethics; 2006 Jul; 116(4):656-79. PubMed ID: 17039628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Creation ethics: reproduction, genetics and quality of life. DeGrazia D J Med Ethics; 2015 May; 41(5):415-6. PubMed ID: 24368841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancing debate about the sexes. Wilkinson D J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):721. PubMed ID: 24242966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]