These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24245501)

  • 1. When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 24245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. You can't ignore what you can't separate: the effect of visually induced target-distractor separation on tactile selection.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 25316048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vision of embodied rubber hands enhances tactile distractor processing.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):477-86. PubMed ID: 25354970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vision of the body and the differentiation of perceived body side in touch.
    Tamè L; Farnè A; Pavani F
    Cortex; 2013 May; 49(5):1340-51. PubMed ID: 22531552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response interference in touch, vision, and crossmodally: beyond the spatial dimension.
    Mast F; Frings C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 232(7):2325-36. PubMed ID: 24728130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16483553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multisensory distractor processing is modulated by spatial attention.
    Merz S; Jensen A; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1375-1388. PubMed ID: 31343245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: how vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand.
    Schicke T; Bauer F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 192(4):703-15. PubMed ID: 18841353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():84. PubMed ID: 24567727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Viewing the body modulates neural mechanisms underlying sustained spatial attention in touch.
    Sambo CF; Gillmeister H; Forster B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 19519638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration.
    Aspell JE; Lavanchy T; Lenggenhager B; Blanke O
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1868-73. PubMed ID: 20584191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1176-1195. PubMed ID: 31444699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual-tactile selective attention in autism spectrum condition: An increased influence of visual distractors.
    Poole D; Gowen E; Warren PA; Poliakoff E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Sep; 147(9):1309-1324. PubMed ID: 29963887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Walton M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
    Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.