These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24246323)
1. Digital tomosynthesis: a new technique for imaging nephrolithiasis. Specific organ doses and effective doses compared with renal stone protocol noncontrast computed tomography. Neisius A; Astroza GM; Wang C; Nguyen G; Kuntz NJ; Januzis N; Ferrandino MN; Yoshizumi TT; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME Urology; 2014 Feb; 83(2):282-7. PubMed ID: 24246323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation exposure in the follow-up of patients with urolithiasis comparing digital tomosynthesis, non-contrast CT, standard KUB, and IVU. Astroza GM; Neisius A; Wang AJ; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Wang C; Januzis N; Lowry C; Ferrandino MN; Neville AN; Yoshizumi TT; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME J Endourol; 2013 Oct; 27(10):1187-91. PubMed ID: 23734577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital Tomosynthesis: A Viable Alternative to Noncontrast Computed Tomography for the Follow-Up of Nephrolithiasis? Cabrera FJ; Kaplan AG; Youssef RF; Tsivian M; Shin RH; Scales CD; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME J Endourol; 2016 Apr; 30(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 27078715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation exposure in urology: a genitourinary catalogue for diagnostic imaging. Neisius A; Wang AJ; Wang C; Nguyen G; Tsivian M; Kuntz NJ; Astroza GM; Lowry C; Toncheva G; Yoshizumi TT; Preminger GM; Ferrandino MN; Lipkin ME J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2117-23. PubMed ID: 23764073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Obesity triples the radiation dose of stone protocol computerized tomography. Wang AJ; Goldsmith ZG; Wang C; Nguyen G; Astroza GM; Neisius A; Iqbal MW; Neville AM; Lowry C; Toncheva G; Yoshizumi TT; Preminger GM; Ferrandino MN; Lipkin ME J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2142-6. PubMed ID: 23261481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abdominal Radiography With Digital Tomosynthesis: An Alternative to Computed Tomography for Identification of Urinary Calculi? Wollin DA; Gupta RT; Young B; Cone E; Kaplan A; Marin D; Patel BN; Mazurowski MA; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME Urology; 2018 Oct; 120():56-61. PubMed ID: 30006268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation dose of digital tomosynthesis for sinonasal examination: comparison with multi-detector CT. Machida H; Yuhara T; Tamura M; Numano T; Abe S; Sabol JM; Suzuki S; Ueno E Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 81(6):1140-5. PubMed ID: 21515010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols. Hurwitz LM; Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Lowry C J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 17882029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital tomosynthesis in the detection of urolithiasis: Diagnostic performance and dosimetry compared with digital radiography with MDCT as the reference standard. Mermuys K; De Geeter F; Bacher K; Van De Moortele K; Coenegrachts K; Steyaert L; Casselman JW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 20566811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control. Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental study of detection of nodules showing ground-glass opacity and radiation dose by using anthropomorphic chest phantom: digital tomosynthesis and multidetector CT. Zhao F; Zeng Y; Peng G; Yu R; Peng S; Tan H; Liu X; Wang J J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 22992600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Typical exposure parameters, organ doses and effective doses for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: Comparison of Monte Carlo simulations and direct measurements with an anthropomorphic phantom. Foerth M; Seidenbusch MC; Sadeghi-Azandaryani M; Lechel U; Treitl KM; Treitl M Eur Radiol; 2015 Sep; 25(9):2617-26. PubMed ID: 25854215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction? Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation dose for body CT protocols: variability of scanners at one institution. Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Anderson-Evans C; Lowry C; Miller CM; Nelson RC; Ravin CE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1141-7. PubMed ID: 19770340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique. Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose estimation for prospective and retrospective ECG-gated cardiac CT angiography in infants and small children using a 320-MDCT volume scanner. Podberesky DJ; Angel E; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Salisbury SR; Alsip C; Barelli A; Egelhoff JC; Anderson-Evans C; Nguyen GB; Dow D; Frush DP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1129-35. PubMed ID: 23096189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing stone attenuation in low- and conventional-dose noncontrast computed tomography. Alsyouf M; Smith DL; Olgin G; Heldt JP; Lightfoot M; Li R; Baldwin DD J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):704-7. PubMed ID: 24517291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EOS Micro-dose Protocol: First Full-spine Radiation Dose Measurements in Anthropomorphic Phantoms and Comparisons with EOS Standard-dose and Conventional Digital Radiology. Pedersen PH; Petersen AG; Østgaard SE; Tvedebrink T; Eiskjær SP Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1313-E1321. PubMed ID: 30383725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]