BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24246512)

  • 1. Cesarean delivery rates in Down syndrome pregnancies.
    Faro R; Santolaya-Forgas J; Oyelese Y; Di Stefano V; Canterino J; Ananth CV
    J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2013; 6(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 24246512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prior cesarean delivery is not associated with an increased risk of stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy: analysis of U.S. perinatal mortality data, 1995-1997.
    Bahtiyar MO; Julien S; Robinson JN; Lumey L; Zybert P; Copel JA; Lockwood CJ; Norwitz ER
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1373-8. PubMed ID: 16677588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mode of Delivery in Stillbirth, 1995-2004.
    Stefano VD; Santolaya-Forgas J; Faro R; Duzyj C; Oyelese Y
    Reprod Sci; 2016 Jan; 23(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 26156855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies.
    Sue-A-Quan AK; Hannah ME; Cohen MM; Foster GA; Liston RM
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 10234344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US term stillbirth rates and the 39-week rule: a cause for concern?
    Nicholson JM; Kellar LC; Ahmad S; Abid A; Woloski J; Hewamudalige N; Henning GF; Lauring JR; Ural SH; Yaklic JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):621.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26880736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study.
    Khalil A; Syngelaki A; Maiz N; Zinevich Y; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 42(6):634-43. PubMed ID: 23630102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary and Repeat Cesarean Deliveries: A Population-based Study in the United States, 1979-2010.
    Ananth CV; Friedman AM; Keyes KM; Lavery JA; Hamilton A; Wright JD
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jul; 28(4):567-574. PubMed ID: 28346271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of cesarean section on intermediate and late preterm births: United States, 2000-2003.
    Malloy MH
    Birth; 2009 Mar; 36(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19278380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology.
    Menacker F; Declercq E; Macdorman MF
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):235-41. PubMed ID: 17011392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Secular trends in cesarean delivery rates among macrosomic deliveries in the United States, 1989 to 2002.
    Boulet SL; Alexander GR; Salihu HM
    J Perinatol; 2005 Sep; 25(9):569-76. PubMed ID: 16079908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion in cesarean deliveries for Japanese twins: comparison with those for singletons.
    Suzuki S; Hiraizumi Y; Miyake H
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 22810621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mode of delivery in antepartum stillbirths.
    Rossi RM; Hall ES; DeFranco EA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 May; 1(2):156-164.e2. PubMed ID: 33345821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary cesarean delivery among parous women in the United States, 1990-2003.
    Ford J; Grewal J; Mikolajczyk R; Meikle S; Zhang J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 112(6):1235-1241. PubMed ID: 19037031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2013.
    Osterman MJ; Martin JA
    Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2014 Nov; 63(6):1-16. PubMed ID: 25383560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why are cesarean delivery rates so high in diabetic pregnancies?
    Blackwell SC; Hassan SS; Wolfe HW; Michaelson J; Berry SM; Sorokin Y
    J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 11031703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Obstetric outcomes in 102 pregnancies after preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
    Strom CM; Strom S; Levine E; Ginsberg N; Barton J; Verlinsky Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1629-32. PubMed ID: 10871489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of neonatal outcomes in elective repeat cesarean delivery at term according to weeks of gestation.
    Ertuğrul S; Gün I; Müngen E; Muhçu M; Kılıç S; Atay V
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 22889289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of obstetric intervention on trends in twin stillbirths: United States, 1989-99.
    Ananth CV; Joseph KS; Kinzler WL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):380-7. PubMed ID: 15280109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.