BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

772 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24246654)

  • 1. One size does not fit all: the emerging frontier in large-scale marine conservation.
    Toonen RJ; Wilhelm T'; Maxwell SM; Wagner D; Bowen BW; Sheppard CR; Taei SM; Teroroko T; Moffitt R; Gaymer CF; Morgan L; Lewis N; Sheppard AL; Parks J; Friedlander AM;
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Dec; 77(1-2):7-10. PubMed ID: 24246654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity.
    Klein CJ; Brown CJ; Halpern BS; Segan DB; McGowan J; Beger M; Watson JE
    Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():17539. PubMed ID: 26631984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation.
    Weeks R; Russ GR; Alcala AC; White AT
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):531-40. PubMed ID: 19843129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.
    Gaines SD; White C; Carr MH; Palumbi SR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18286-93. PubMed ID: 20200311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can marine reserves restore lost ecosystem functioning? A global synthesis.
    Cheng BS; Altieri AH; Torchin ME; Ruiz GM
    Ecology; 2019 Apr; 100(4):e02617. PubMed ID: 30933358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biodiversity conservation should focus on no-take Marine Reserves: 94% of Marine Protected Areas allow fishing.
    Costello MJ; Ballantine B
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 Sep; 30(9):507-9. PubMed ID: 26321055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating approaches for scaling-up community-based marine-protected areas into socially equitable and ecologically representative networks.
    Kockel A; Ban NC; Costa M; Dearden P
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 31206826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
    Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas.
    Klein CJ; Chan A; Kircher L; Cundiff AJ; Gardner N; Hrovat Y; Scholz A; Kendall BE; Airamé S
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 18325043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding and managing human threats to the coastal marine environment.
    Crain CM; Halpern BS; Beck MW; Kappel CV
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():39-62. PubMed ID: 19432644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential benefits to fisheries and biodiversity of the Chagos Archipelago/British Indian Ocean Territory as a no-take marine reserve.
    Koldewey HJ; Curnick D; Harding S; Harrison LR; Gollock M
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2010 Nov; 60(11):1906-15. PubMed ID: 20965522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the multiple benefits of partially protected marine protected areas in Australia: A systematic review protocol.
    Phillips GAC; Krueck N; Ogier E; Barrett N; Dutton I; Hartmann K
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0284711. PubMed ID: 37079655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pelagic protected areas: the missing dimension in ocean conservation.
    Game ET; Grantham HS; Hobday AJ; Pressey RL; Lombard AT; Beckley LE; Gjerde K; Bustamante R; Possingham HP; Richardson AJ
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2009 Jul; 24(7):360-9. PubMed ID: 19324450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An approach for integrating economic impact analysis into the evaluation of potential marine protected area sites.
    Dalton TM
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Apr; 70(4):333-49. PubMed ID: 15016442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using marine reserves to manage impact of bottom trawl fisheries requires consideration of benthic food-web interactions.
    van Denderen PD; Rijnsdorp AD; van Kooten T
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):2302-2310. PubMed ID: 27755714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction to marine managed areas.
    Hilborn R
    Adv Mar Biol; 2014; 69():1-13. PubMed ID: 25358296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current status of marine protected areas in latin america and the Caribbean.
    Guarderas AP; Hacker SD; Lubchenco J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1630-40. PubMed ID: 18717690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New perspectives on sea use management: initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning.
    Douvere F; Ehler CN
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 18786758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ocean zoning for conservation, fisheries and marine renewable energy: assessing trade-offs and co-location opportunities.
    Yates KL; Schoeman DS; Klein CJ
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 152():201-9. PubMed ID: 25684567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying biases in marine-protected-area placement relative to abatable threats.
    Kuempel CD; Jones KR; Watson JEM; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 31131932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.