These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24246797)
1. Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience. Kahi CJ; Vemulapalli KC; Johnson CS; Rex DK Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar; 79(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 24246797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defining Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Due to a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test. Hilsden RJ; Bridges R; Dube C; McGregor SE; Naugler C; Rose SM; Rostom A; Heitman SJ Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 111(12):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 27725649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures. Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy as a quality indicator of colonoscopy. Park SK; Kim HY; Lee CK; Cha JM; Eun CS; Han DS; Lee BI; Shin JE; Park DI Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul; 51(7):886-90. PubMed ID: 27001284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Irrespective of Indication Is Comparable to Screening ADR: Implications for Quality Monitoring. Kaltenbach T; Gawron A; Meyer CS; Gupta S; Shergill A; Dominitz JA; Soetikno RM; Nguyen-Vu T; A Whooley M; Kahi CJ Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1883-1889.e1. PubMed ID: 33618027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans. El-Halabi MM; Rex DK; Saito A; Eckert GJ; Kahi CJ Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jan; 89(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30144416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of adenoma detection rate benchmarks in women versus men. Coe SG; Wallace MB Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 23375528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate. Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients. Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing. Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance. Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate. Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality. Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of adenomas per colonoscopy and adenomas per positive participant as new quality parameters in screening colonoscopy. Gessl I; Waldmann E; Penz D; Majcher B; Dokladanska A; Hinterberger A; Szymanska A; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30138613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position. Lurix E; Hernandez AV; Thoma M; Castro F Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 22321696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adenoma and Serrated Lesion Detection by Colonoscopy Indication: The ADR-ESS (ADR Extended to all Screening/Surveillance) Score. Ladabaum U; Shepard J; Mannalithara A Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1873-1882. PubMed ID: 33895358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]