These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2424731)

  • 1. Magnetic localisation of intracranial dipoles: simulation with a physical model.
    Weinberg H; Brickett P; Coolsma F; Baff M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Aug; 64(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 2424731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of magnetoencephalographic data using the homogeneous sphere model: empirical tests.
    Janday BS; Swithenby SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Jan; 32(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 3823128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Location of electric current sources in the human brain estimated by the dipole tracing method of the scalp-skull-brain (SSB) head model.
    Homma S; Musha T; Nakajima Y; Okamoto Y; Blom S; Flink R; Hagbarth KE; Moström U
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 91(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 7525234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probability-based current dipole localization from biomagnetic fields.
    Scholz B; Schwierz G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Aug; 41(8):735-42. PubMed ID: 7927396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 7681385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved procedure for neuromagnetic localisation.
    Pistella F; Barone P; Narici L; Ocello N; Pizzella V; Romani GL
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Jan; 32(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 3823130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A hole in the skull distorts substantially the distribution of extracranial electrical fields in an in vitro model.
    Heasman BC; Valentín A; Alarcón G; García Seoane JJ; Binnie CD; Guy CN
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Apr; 19(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 11997728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical limits on the biomagnetic inverse process determined from in vitro measurements in spherical conducting volumes.
    Hansen JS; Ko HW; Fisher RS; Litt B
    Phys Med Biol; 1988 Jan; 33(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 3353445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of single-dipole inverse solution when localising ventricular pre-excitation sites: simulation study.
    Hren R; Stroink G; Horácek BM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1998 May; 36(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 9747572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data.
    Mosher JC; Lewis PS; Leahy RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jun; 39(6):541-57. PubMed ID: 1601435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time-points.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL; Goodwill G
    Brain Topogr; 1994; 6(4):283-98. PubMed ID: 7946928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approximating dipoles from human EEG activity: the effect of dipole source configuration on dipolarity using single dipole models.
    Hara J; Musha T; Shankle WR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Feb; 46(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 9932333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium.
    Barth DS; Sutherling W; Broffman J; Beatty J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Mar; 63(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 2419084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generators of visual evoked potentials investigated by dipole tracing in the human occipital cortex.
    Ikeda H; Nishijo H; Miyamoto K; Tamura R; Endo S; Ono T
    Neuroscience; 1998 Jun; 84(3):723-39. PubMed ID: 9579779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional brain imaging: dipole localization and Laplacian methods.
    Srebro R; Oguz RM; Hughlett K; Purdy PD
    Vision Res; 1993 Dec; 33(17):2413-9. PubMed ID: 8249319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic fields of the brain analysed by a multiple dipole approach using factor analysis.
    Grummich P; Vieth J; Kober H
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1991; 12 Suppl A():61-6. PubMed ID: 1778056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the human brain.
    Yamamoto T; Williamson SJ; Kaufman L; Nicholson C; Llinás R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1988 Nov; 85(22):8732-6. PubMed ID: 3186757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of holes on EEG forward solutions using a realistic geometry head model.
    Li J; Wang K; Zhu S; He B
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Sep; 4(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 17873421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Magnetocardiographic localization of an accessory pathway in patients with WPW syndrome].
    Nomura M; Watanabe K; Katayama M; Takeuchi A; Ishihara S; Kiyoshige K; Fujimoto T; Fujino K; Nakaya Y; Mori H
    J Cardiol; 1990; 20(1):227-39. PubMed ID: 2093756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.