These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24247591)

  • 1. Practice does not make perfect in a modified sustained attention to response task.
    Head J; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Feb; 232(2):565-73. PubMed ID: 24247591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task.
    Wilson KM; Finkbeiner KM; de Joux NR; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2989-98. PubMed ID: 27329605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task.
    Finkbeiner KM; Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 233(4):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25537468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prolonging the response movement inhibits the feed-forward motor program in the sustained attention to response task.
    Wilson KM; de Joux NR; Finkbeiner KM; Russell PN; Retzler JR; Helton WS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():75-84. PubMed ID: 29351864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?
    Head J; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):913-9. PubMed ID: 23838467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliable- and unreliable-warning cues in the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Helton WS; Head J; Russell PN
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 209(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 21287153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spider stimuli improve response inhibition.
    Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 May; 33():406-13. PubMed ID: 25770464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual decoupling or trigger happiness: the effect of response delays and shorter presentation times on a go-no-go task with a high go prevalence.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Apr; 242(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 38448673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual decoupling in the sustained attention to response task is unlikely.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Aug; 242(8):2033-2040. PubMed ID: 38958722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring sustained attention after traumatic brain injury: differences in key findings from the sustained attention to response task (SART).
    Whyte J; Grieb-Neff P; Gantz C; Polansky M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):2007-14. PubMed ID: 16682059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Text-speak processing and the sustained attention to response task.
    Head J; Russell PN; Dorahy MJ; Neumann E; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 216(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 22052188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of real-time performance feedback and performance emphasis on the sustained attention to response task (SART).
    Mensen JM; Dang JS; Stets AJ; Helton WS
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1972-1979. PubMed ID: 34623490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Attention-Lapse and Motor Decoupling accounts of SART performance are not mutually exclusive.
    Seli P
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Apr; 41():189-98. PubMed ID: 26946296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention.
    Dang JS; Figueroa IJ; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2255-2262. PubMed ID: 29846798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS; Kern RP; Walker DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 19589699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Glucose and the wandering mind: not paying attention or simply out of fuel?
    Birnie LH; Smallwood J; Reay J; Riby LM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Aug; 232(16):2903-10. PubMed ID: 25893640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
    Carter L; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 23501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response uncertainty influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Psychol Res; 2024 Feb; 88(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 37318596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influences of task repetition, napping, time of day, and instruction on the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    van Schie MK; Alblas EE; Thijs RD; Fronczek R; Lammers GJ; van Dijk JG
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(10):1055-65. PubMed ID: 25494633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.