These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24247775)

  • 1. The effect of positive assortative mating on genetic parameters in a simulated beef cattle population.
    Kemp RA; Kennedy BW; Wilton JW
    Theor Appl Genet; 1986 Apr; 72(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 24247775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rules for assortative mating in relation to selection for linear merit functions.
    Fernando RL; Gianola D
    Theor Appl Genet; 1984 Jun; 68(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 24259059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential response from selection for high calving ease vs. low birth weight in American Simmental beef cattle.
    Saad HM; Thomas MG; Speidel SE; Peel RK; Frasier WM; Enns RM
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jul; 98(7):. PubMed ID: 32609315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias in genomic predictions by mating practices for linear type traits in a large-scale genomic evaluation.
    Tsuruta S; Lawlor TJ; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jan; 104(1):662-677. PubMed ID: 33162076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic (co)variances among birth weight, 200-day weight, and postweaning gain in composites and parental breeds of beef cattle.
    Bennett GL; Gregory KE
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2598-611. PubMed ID: 8923174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic (co)variances for calving difficulty score in composite and parental populations of beef cattle: II. Reproductive, skeletal, and carcass traits.
    Bennett GL; Gregory KE
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11204715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection for weaning weight and postweaning gain in Hereford cattle. II. Response to selection.
    Irgang R; Dillard EU; Tess MW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1985 May; 60(5):1142-55. PubMed ID: 4008362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sire marbling score expected progeny difference and weaning weight maternal expected progeny difference associations with age at first calving and calving interval in Angus beef cattle.
    Frazier EL; Sprott LR; Sanders JO; Dahm PF; Crouch JR; Turner JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Jun; 77(6):1322-8. PubMed ID: 10375207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of assortative mating for pupa weight on genetic parameters of unselected Tribolium castaneum.
    Mwenya WN; Gianola D; Grossman M
    Theor Appl Genet; 1986 Jun; 72(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 24247948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Symmetric differences squared and analysis of variance procedures for estimating genetic and environmental variances and covariances for beef cattle weaning weight: I. Comparison via simulation.
    Bruckner CM; Slanger WD
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Dec; 63(6):1779-93. PubMed ID: 3818459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic relationships among calving ease, calving interval, birth weight, and weaning weight in the Asturiana de los Valles beef cattle breed.
    Gutiérrez JP; Goyache F; Fernández I; Alvarez I; Royo LJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jan; 85(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 17179541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assortative mating can help adaptation of flowering time to a changing climate: Insights from a polygenic model.
    Godineau C; Ronce O; Devaux C
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Apr; 35(4):491-508. PubMed ID: 33794053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of assortative mating on genetic change due to selection.
    Fernando RL; Gianola D
    Theor Appl Genet; 1986 Jun; 72(3):395-404. PubMed ID: 24247949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Additive and nonadditive genetic variability for growth traits in the Turipaná Romosinuano-Zebu multibreed herd.
    Elzo MA; Manrique C; Ossa G; Acosta O
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 9655573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assortative mating and the genetic correlation.
    Gianola D
    Theor Appl Genet; 1982 Sep; 62(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 24270615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of non-additive genetic variances in three synthetic lines of beef cattle using an animal model.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Willham RL; Northcutt SL
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Apr; 73(4):1002-11. PubMed ID: 7628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct and maternal variances and covariances and maternal phenotypic effects on preweaning growth of beef cattle.
    Cantet RJ; Kress DD; Anderson DC; Doornbos DE; Burfening PJ; Blackwell RL
    J Anim Sci; 1988 Mar; 66(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 3378922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection for weaning weight and postweaning gain in Hereford cattle. I. Population structure and selection applied.
    Irgang R; Dillard EU; Tess MW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1985 May; 60(5):1133-41. PubMed ID: 4008361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strong phenotypic trait correlations between mating partners do not result from assortative mating in wild great tits (Parus major).
    Holtmann B; Dingemanse NJ
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Apr; 35(4):552-560. PubMed ID: 34327779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic similarity between relatives provides evidence on the presence and history of assortative mating.
    Sunde HF; Eftedal NH; Cheesman R; Corfield EC; Kleppesto TH; Seierstad AC; Ystrom E; Eilertsen EM; Torvik FA
    Nat Commun; 2024 Mar; 15(1):2641. PubMed ID: 38531929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.