506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24248549)
1. The effect of two different trochanteric nail lag-screw designs on fixation stability of four-part intertrochanteric fractures: a clinical and biomechanical study.
Takemoto RC; Lekic N; Schwarzkopf R; Kummer FJ; Egol KA
J Orthop Sci; 2014 Jan; 19(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 24248549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Helical blade vs telescoping lag screw for intertrochanteric fracture fixation.
Schwarzkopf R; Takemoto RC; Kummer FJ; Egol KA
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Sep; 40(9):452-6. PubMed ID: 22022674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of a sliding hip screw with a trochanteric lateral support plate to an intramedullary hip screw for fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a cadaver study.
Bong MR; Patel V; Iesaka K; Egol KA; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ
J Trauma; 2004 Apr; 56(4):791-4. PubMed ID: 15187744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: one or two lag screws.
Kubiak EN; Bong M; Park SS; Kummer F; Egol K; Koval KJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2004 Jan; 18(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 14676551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a biomechanical evaluation.
Strauss E; Frank J; Lee J; Kummer FJ; Tejwani N
Injury; 2006 Oct; 37(10):984-9. PubMed ID: 16934256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The trochanteric nail versus the sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a review of 93 cases.
Crawford CH; Malkani AL; Cordray S; Roberts CS; Sligar W
J Trauma; 2006 Feb; 60(2):325-8; discussion 328-9. PubMed ID: 16508490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is tip apex distance as important as we think? A biomechanical study examining optimal lag screw placement.
Kane P; Vopat B; Heard W; Thakur N; Paller D; Koruprolu S; Born C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 472(8):2492-8. PubMed ID: 24760583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sliding of two lag screw designs in a highly comminuted fracture model.
Kummer FJ; Schwarzkopf R; Takemoto RC; Egol KA
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 22196383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical comparison of static versus dynamic lag screw modes for cephalomedullary nails used to fix unstable peritrochanteric fractures.
Kuzyk PR; Shah S; Zdero R; Olsen M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Feb; 72(2):E65-70. PubMed ID: 22439235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Embedding the lateral end of the lag screw within the lateral wall in the repair of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric femur fracture.
Hiragami K; Ishii J
J Int Med Res; 2018 Mar; 46(3):1103-1108. PubMed ID: 29082791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The "Z-effect" phenomenon defined: a laboratory study.
Strauss EJ; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ; Egol KA
J Orthop Res; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1568-73. PubMed ID: 17592624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of tip-apex distance and femoral head lag screw position on treatment outcomes of unstable intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary nails.
Lee CH; Su KC; Chen KH; Pan CC; Wu YC
J Int Med Res; 2018 Jun; 46(6):2128-2140. PubMed ID: 29848122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail.
Park SY; Yang KH; Yoo JH; Yoon HK; Park HW
J Trauma; 2008 Oct; 65(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 18849802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures. A biomechanical study.
Kummer FJ; Olsson O; Pearlman CA; Ceder L; Larsson S; Koval KJ
Acta Orthop Scand; 1998 Dec; 69(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 9930101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Femoral head lag screw position for cephalomedullary nails: a biomechanical analysis.
Kuzyk PR; Zdero R; Shah S; Olsen M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Jul; 26(7):414-21. PubMed ID: 22337483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional and radiographic outcomes of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with calcar reduction, compression, and trochanteric entry nailing.
Paul O; Barker JU; Lane JM; Helfet DL; Lorich DG
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Mar; 26(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 21918483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of interlocking lag screw design in intramedullary nailing of unstable pertrochanteric fractures.
Hoffmann S; Paetzold R; Stephan D; Püschel K; Buehren V; Augat P
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Sep; 27(9):483-90. PubMed ID: 23860133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative techniques in trochanteric hip fracture surgery. Clinical and biomechanical studies on the Medoff sliding plate and the Twin hook.
Olsson O
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 2000 Oct; 295():1-31. PubMed ID: 11116961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive screw plates for surgery of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical comparative study.
Ropars M; Mitton D; Skalli W
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1012-7. PubMed ID: 18579266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which Fixation Device is Preferred for Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in the United States? A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Niu E; Yang A; Harris AH; Bishop J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3647-55. PubMed ID: 26208608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
