These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24253361)

  • 21. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
    Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Functional outcomes for speech-in-noise intelligibility of NAL-NL2 and DSL v.5 prescriptive fitting rules in hearing aid users.
    Portelli D; Loteta S; Ciodaro F; Salvago P; Galletti C; Freni L; Alberti G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):3227-3235. PubMed ID: 38546852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Restoring Perceived Loudness for Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):664-678. PubMed ID: 29210810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Marriage J
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):339-53. PubMed ID: 11848176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures.
    Byrne D; Dillon H; Ching T; Katsch R; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jan; 12(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 11214977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
    Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Brennan M; Stecker GC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children.
    Marriage JE; Vickers DA; Baer T; Glasberg BR; Moore BCJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 28691934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of real-ear insertion gains in Japanese-speaking individuals wearing hearing aids with DSLv5 and NAL-NL2.
    Furuki S; Sano H; Kurioka T; Ogiwara A; Nakagawa T; Inoue R; Umehara S; Hara Y; Suzuki K; Yamashita T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Feb; 48(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 32747167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of an Automated Hearing Aid Fitting Using Real Ear Measures Embedded in a Manufacturer Fitting Software.
    Brockmeyer A; Voss A; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):157-163. PubMed ID: 34062602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Amplification Self-Adjustment: Controls and Repeatability.
    Boothroyd A; Retana J; Mackersie CL
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):808-821. PubMed ID: 34653029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain.
    Perry TT; Nelson PB; Van Tasell DJ
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837124. PubMed ID: 30880645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners.
    Digeser FM; Engler M; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 31809219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of Hearing Aid Manufacturers' Software-Derived Fittings to DSL v5.0 Pediatric Targets.
    Folkeard P; Bagatto M; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 31639078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss.
    Quar TK; Ching TY; Newall P; Sharma M
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 23570290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Carter L; O'Brien A
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec; 16(4):211-23. PubMed ID: 23203416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving audibility with nonlinear amplification for listeners with high-frequency loss.
    Souza PE; Bishop RD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 10783924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.