These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Biomechanical performance of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of interference screw fixation, cortical button fixation, and interference screw diameter. Sethi PM; Rajaram A; Beitzel K; Hackett TR; Chowaniec DM; Mazzocca AD J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Apr; 22(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 22743072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model. Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis With PEEK Interference Screw: A Biomechanical Analysis of Humeral Fracture Risk. Mellano CR; Frank RM; Shin JJ; Jain A; Zuke WA; Mascarenhas R; Shewman E; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN; Forsythe B Arthroscopy; 2018 Mar; 34(3):806-813. PubMed ID: 29287950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Mazzocca AD; Bicos J; Santangelo S; Romeo AA; Arciero RA Arthroscopy; 2005 Nov; 21(11):1296-306. PubMed ID: 16325079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis of the Shoulder: Indications and Technique Options. Nuelle CW; Sheean A; Tucker CJ Arthroscopy; 2020 Sep; 36(9):2352-2353. PubMed ID: 32325099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical study comparing biceps wedge tenodesis with other proximal long head of the biceps tenodesis techniques. Su WR; Budoff JE; Chiang CH; Lee CJ; Lin CL Arthroscopy; 2013 Sep; 29(9):1498-505. PubMed ID: 23992987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of interference screw depth on fixation strength in biceps tenodesis. Salata MJ; Bailey JR; Bell R; Frank RM; McGill KC; Lin EC; Kercher JS; Wang VM; Provencher MT; Mazzocca AD; Verma NN; Romeo AA Arthroscopy; 2014 Jan; 30(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 24183106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biceps Tenodesis Fixation Strengths: Fixation Type and Location Are Biomechanically Equivalent. Dekker TJ; Peebles LA; Preuss FR; Goldenberg BT; Dornan GJ; Provencher MT Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):3081-3091. PubMed ID: 32619605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biomechanical comparison of two arthroscopic suture techniques in biceps tenodesis: whip-stitch vs. simple suture techniques. Agarwalla A; Puzzitiello RN; Leong NL; Shewman EF; Verma NN; Romeo AA; Forsythe B J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Aug; 28(8):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 30948215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. All-suture anchor and unicortical button show comparable biomechanical properties for onlay subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Otto A; Siebenlist S; Baldino JB; Murphy M; Muench LN; Mehl J; Obopilwe E; Cote MP; Imhoff AB; Mazzocca AD JSES Int; 2020 Dec; 4(4):833-837. PubMed ID: 33345223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: effect of screw malpositioning on proximal humeral strength. Euler SA; Smith SD; Williams BT; Dornan GJ; Millett PJ; Wijdicks CA Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jan; 43(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 25371439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]