These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2425373)

  • 1. Process and impact evaluation of a cancer screening education program.
    Keintz MK; Fleisher L; Rimer B; Bennett D; Wilson C; Engstrom PF
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1986; 216():455-63. PubMed ID: 2425373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Process and impact evaluation of a cancer program for older people.
    Fleisher L; Rimer B; Keintz MK; Engstrom PF; Wilson C
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 248():135-44. PubMed ID: 3671401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary prevention for eating disorders: the impact of education, screening, and referral in a college-based screening program.
    Becker AE; Franko DL; Nussbaum K; Herzog DB
    Int J Eat Disord; 2004 Sep; 36(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 15282685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cancer education and screening in the workplace: the corporate perspective.
    Zimmerman L; Jackson G; Hughes J; Minkoff M
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 248():109-19. PubMed ID: 3671399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An experimental evaluation of the KAP model for HE.
    Hamilton NE; Belzer EG; Thiebaux HJ
    Int J Health Educ; 1980; 23(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 6162294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Process evaluation in an intervention designed to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening in a VA medical center.
    Fitzgibbon ML; Ferreira MR; Dolan NC; Davis TC; Rademaker AW; Wolf MS; Liu D; Gorby N; Schmitt BP; Bennett CL
    Health Promot Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 17606952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative methodologies for the community distribution of a cancer risk assessment form.
    Balshem AM; Amsel Z; Gillespie D; Guidera-Matey A; Engstrom P
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 248():161-72. PubMed ID: 3671404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with participation in an occupational program for colorectal cancer screening.
    Vernon SW; Acquavella JF; Douglass TS; Hughes JI
    J Occup Med; 1989 May; 31(5):458-63. PubMed ID: 2715855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Innovative approach to alter fatalistic misconceptions in a high cancer mortality community.
    Workman SW; Amsel Z; Engstrom PF
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 248():67-74. PubMed ID: 3671421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a community breast screening promotion program using baseline data.
    Worden JK; Mickey RM; Flynn BS; Costanza MC; Vacek PM; Skelly JM; Lloyd CM; Landis DC; Myer DM; Noonan MA
    Prev Med; 1994 May; 23(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 8078846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personalized screening for colorectal cancer.
    Fletcher RH
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S5-9. PubMed ID: 18725833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of satisfaction with cancer screening at mobile van and static sites: National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.
    Yoon NH; Lee HY; Kwak MS; Choi KS; Jun JK; Kim MK; Park EC
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 39(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 19179364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Building a community network for a cancer education/screening program: the process and lessons learned (or relearned).
    McKenzie JF; Butts BM; Cox BA; Craig FF
    Health Promot Pract; 2004 Jul; 5(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 15228782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Secondary cancer prevention in the elderly.
    Zabalegui A
    Cancer Nurs; 1994 Jun; 17(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 8055492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Satisfaction of women attending the Manitoba breast screening program.
    Decker KM; Harrison M; Tate RB
    Prev Med; 1999 Jul; 29(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 10419795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: the importance of follow-up.
    Etzioni DA; Yano EM; Rubenstein LV; Lee ML; Ko CY; Brook RH; Parkerton PH; Asch SM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Jul; 49(7):1002-10. PubMed ID: 16673056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of the nurse in developing cancer screening programs.
    Mahon SM
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2000 Oct; 27(9 Suppl):19-27. PubMed ID: 11058980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Industrial cancer education and screening.
    Heyden S
    Proc Annu Meet Med Sect Am Counc Life Insur; 1981; ():71-81. PubMed ID: 7346862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a cervical cancer education program for native American women in North Carolina.
    Dignan M; Sharp P; Blinson K; Michielutte R; Konen J; Bell R; Lane C
    J Cancer Educ; 1995; 9(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 7734289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public education in primary and secondary cancer prevention.
    Van Parijs LG; Eckhardt S
    Hygie; 1984 Sep; 3(3):16-28. PubMed ID: 6490014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.