These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24253802)

  • 1. LESS and NOTES instrumentation: future.
    Morgan M; Olweny EO; Cadeddu JA
    Curr Opin Urol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 24253802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. LESSons in minimally invasive urology.
    Dev H; Sooriakumaran P; Tewari A; Rane A
    BJU Int; 2011 May; 107(10):1555-9. PubMed ID: 20955267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New technology and applied research: what the future holds for LESS and NOTES.
    Olweny EO; Best SL; Tracy CR; Cadeddu JA
    Arch Esp Urol; 2012 Apr; 65(3):434-43. PubMed ID: 22495285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New technologies in robotic surgery: the Korean experience.
    Tuliao PH; Kim SW; Rha KH
    Curr Opin Urol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 24247172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (R-NOTES): literature review and prototype system.
    Azizi Koutenaei B; Wilson E; Monfaredi R; Peters C; Kronreif G; Cleary K
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015 Feb; 24(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 25539996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Novel laparoscopic techniques in gynecologic surgery].
    Sziller P; Langmár Z
    Orv Hetil; 2011 May; 152(20):785-92. PubMed ID: 21540151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature.
    Autorino R; Cadeddu JA; Desai MM; Gettman M; Gill IS; Kavoussi LR; Lima E; Montorsi F; Richstone L; Stolzenburg JU; Kaouk JH
    Eur Urol; 2011 Jan; 59(1):26-45. PubMed ID: 20828918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Present and future advanced laparoscopic surgery.
    Rivas H; Díaz-Calderón D
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2013 May; 6(2):59-67. PubMed ID: 23601993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is robotics the future of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS)?
    Spana G; Rane A; Kaouk JH
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):1018-23. PubMed ID: 21917105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotics in endoscopy.
    Klibansky D; Rothstein RI
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2012 Sep; 28(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 22885946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of design rationale for a robotic system for single-incision laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
    Yao W; Childs PR
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):821-30. PubMed ID: 23674579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: current status.
    Rane A; Autorino R
    Curr Opin Urol; 2011 Jan; 21(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 20962649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technological advances in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
    Tan GY; Goel RK; Kaouk JH; Tewari AK
    Urol Clin North Am; 2009 May; 36(2):237-49, ix. PubMed ID: 19406324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pure single-port laparoscopic surgery or mix of techniques?
    Liatsikos E; Kyriazis I; Kallidonis P; Do M; Dietel A; Stolzenburg JU
    World J Urol; 2012 Oct; 30(5):581-7. PubMed ID: 22016141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical robots for SPL and NOTES: a review.
    Zhao J; Feng B; Zheng MH; Xu K
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015 Feb; 24(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 25597629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic anchoring and guidance system instrumentation for laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery/natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: lack of histologic damage after prolonged magnetic coupling across the abdominal wall.
    Best SL; Kabbani W; Scott DJ; Bergs R; Beardsley H; Fernandez R; Mashaud LB; Cadeddu JA
    Urology; 2011 Jan; 77(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 20947148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Miniature surgical robots in the era of NOTES and LESS: dream or reality?
    Zygomalas A; Kehagias I; Giokas K; Koutsouris D
    Surg Innov; 2015 Feb; 22(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 24828382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Future perspectives in robotic surgery.
    Wedmid A; Llukani E; Lee DI
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):1028-36. PubMed ID: 21917107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Future robotic platforms in urologic surgery: recent developments.
    Herrell SD; Webster R; Simaan N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 24253803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A miniaturized robotic platform for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: in vivo validation.
    Tognarelli S; Salerno M; Tortora G; Quaglia C; Dario P; Schurr MO; Menciassi A
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3477-84. PubMed ID: 25676200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.