267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24254138)
1. Clinical and economic impact of substituting dexmedetomidine for propofol due to a US drug shortage: examination of coronary artery bypass graft patients at an urban medical centre.
Thoma BN; Li J; McDaniel CM; Wordell CJ; Cavarocchi N; Pizzi LT
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Feb; 32(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24254138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and economic impact of the use of dexmedetomidine for sedation in the intensive care unit compared to propofol.
Mo Y; Shcherbakova N; Zeibeq J; Muzykovsky K; Li WK; Gasperino J
Int J Clin Pharm; 2020 Dec; 42(6):1419-1424. PubMed ID: 32860596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on extubation times, length of stay and mortality rates in adult cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nguyen J; Nacpil N
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2018 May; 16(5):1220-1239. PubMed ID: 29762314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of dexmedetomidine on analgesic requirements in patients after cardiac surgery in a fast-track recovery room setting.
Barletta JF; Miedema SL; Wiseman D; Heiser JC; McAllen KJ
Pharmacotherapy; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1427-32. PubMed ID: 19947802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of a dexmedetomidine substitution during a nationwide propofol shortage in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Reichert MG; Jones WA; Royster RL; Slaughter TF; Kon ND; Kincaid EH
Pharmacotherapy; 2011 Jul; 31(7):673-7. PubMed ID: 21923454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol on Hospital Costs and Length of Stay.
Patanwala AE; Erstad BL
J Intensive Care Med; 2016 Aug; 31(7):466-70. PubMed ID: 25061063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Propofol-based versus dexmedetomidine-based sedation in cardiac surgery patients.
Curtis JA; Hollinger MK; Jain HB
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1289-94. PubMed ID: 24011878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens.
Herr DL; Sum-Ping ST; England M
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Oct; 17(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 14579210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dexmedetomidine versus standard care sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care: an economic evaluation.
Turunen H; Jakob SM; Ruokonen E; Kaukonen KM; Sarapohja T; Apajasalo M; Takala J
Crit Care; 2015 Feb; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 25887576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study.
Hu J; Lv B; West R; Chen X; Yan Y; Pac Soo C; Ma D
BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):51. PubMed ID: 35183122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiovascular surgery.
Wanat M; Fitousis K; Boston F; Masud F
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2014; 10(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 25114763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addition of dexmedetomidine to standard sedation regimens after cardiac surgery: an outcomes analysis.
Dasta JF; Jacobi J; Sesti AM; McLaughlin TP
Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Jun; 26(6):798-805. PubMed ID: 16716133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and efficacy of ketamine-dexmedetomidine versus ketamine-propofol combinations for sedation in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Mogahd MM; Mahran MS; Elbaradi GF
Ann Card Anaesth; 2017; 20(2):182-187. PubMed ID: 28393778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sedation effects by dexmedetomidine versus propofol in decreasing duration of mechanical ventilation after open heart surgery.
Elgebaly AS; Sabry M
Ann Card Anaesth; 2018; 21(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 30052208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cost-minimization analysis of dexmedetomidine compared with midazolam for long-term sedation in the intensive care unit.
Dasta JF; Kane-Gill SL; Pencina M; Shehabi Y; Bokesch PM; Wisemandle W; Riker RR
Crit Care Med; 2010 Feb; 38(2):497-503. PubMed ID: 19789442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost effectiveness of a benzodiazepine vs a nonbenzodiazepine-based sedation regimen for mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults.
Bioc JJ; Magee C; Cucchi J; Fraser GL; Dasta JF; Edwards RA; Devlin JW
J Crit Care; 2014 Oct; 29(5):753-7. PubMed ID: 24996761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pharmacy-Driven Dexmedetomidine Stewardship and Appropriate Use Guidelines in a Community Hospital Setting.
Schickli MA; Eberwein KA; Short MR; Ratliff PD
Ann Pharmacother; 2017 Jan; 51(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27543645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of a protocol advocating dexmedetomidine over propofol sedation after robotic-assisted direct coronary artery bypass surgery on duration of mechanical ventilation and patient safety.
Torbic H; Papadopoulos S; Manjourides J; Devlin JW
Ann Pharmacother; 2013 Apr; 47(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 23535816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dexmedetomidine does not improve patient satisfaction when compared with propofol during mechanical ventilation.
Corbett SM; Rebuck JA; Greene CM; Callas PW; Neale BW; Healey MA; Leavitt BJ
Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 33(5):940-5. PubMed ID: 15891317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials.
Jakob SM; Ruokonen E; Grounds RM; Sarapohja T; Garratt C; Pocock SJ; Bratty JR; Takala J;
JAMA; 2012 Mar; 307(11):1151-60. PubMed ID: 22436955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
