126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24254582)
1. Excellent inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of microvascular tests using laser speckle contrast imaging.
Humeau-Heurtier A; Abraham P; Durand S; Mahé G
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2014; 58(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 24254582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging with laser Doppler for assessing microvascular function.
Tew GA; Klonizakis M; Crank H; Briers JD; Hodges GJ
Microvasc Res; 2011 Nov; 82(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 21803051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of non-invasive assessment of skin endothelial function using laser Doppler flowmetry and laser speckle contrast imaging.
Puissant C; Abraham P; Durand S; Humeau-Heurtier A; Faure S; Lefthériotis G; Rousseau P; Mahé G
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61320. PubMed ID: 23620742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing cutaneous microvascular function with iontophoresis: Avoiding non-specific vasodilation.
Loader J; Roustit M; Taylor F; MacIsaac RJ; Stewart S; Lorenzen C; Walther G
Microvasc Res; 2017 Sep; 113():29-39. PubMed ID: 28457877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative reproducibility of dermal microvascular blood flow changes in response to acetylcholine iontophoresis, hyperthermia and reactive hyperaemia.
Agarwal SC; Allen J; Murray A; Purcell IF
Physiol Meas; 2010 Jan; 31(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19940349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Excellent reproducibility of laser speckle contrast imaging to assess skin microvascular reactivity.
Roustit M; Millet C; Blaise S; Dufournet B; Cracowski JL
Microvasc Res; 2010 Dec; 80(3):505-11. PubMed ID: 20542492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-Invasive Measurement of Skin Microvascular Response during Pharmacological and Physiological Provocations.
Iredahl F; Löfberg A; Sjöberg F; Farnebo S; Tesselaar E
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133760. PubMed ID: 26270037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increasing the "region of interest" and "time of interest", both reduce the variability of blood flow measurements using laser speckle contrast imaging.
Rousseau P; Mahé G; Haj-Yassin F; Durand S; Humeau A; Leftheriotis G; Abraham P
Microvasc Res; 2011 Jul; 82(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 21439303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The evaluation of penile microvascular endothelial function using laser speckle contrast imaging in healthy volunteers.
Verri V; Brandão A; Tibirica E
Microvasc Res; 2015 May; 99():96-101. PubMed ID: 25843506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility and normalization of reactive hyperemia using laser speckle contrast imaging.
Shirazi BR; Valentine RJ; Lang JA
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244795. PubMed ID: 33412561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of systemic microvascular endothelial function using laser speckle contrast imaging.
Cordovil I; Huguenin G; Rosa G; Bello A; Köhler O; de Moraes R; Tibiriçá E
Microvasc Res; 2012 May; 83(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 22326551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of endothelial function by acetylcholine iontophoresis: impact of inter-electrode distance and electrical cutaneous resistance.
Puissant C; Abraham P; Durand S; Humeau-Heurtier A; Faure S; Leftheriotis G; Mahé G
Microvasc Res; 2014 May; 93():114-8. PubMed ID: 24735977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of microvascular endothelial function in type 1 diabetes using laser speckle contrast imaging.
de M Matheus AS; Clemente EL; de Lourdes Guimarães Rodrigues M; Torres Valença DC; Gomes MB
J Diabetes Complications; 2017 Apr; 31(4):753-757. PubMed ID: 28089343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of skin temperature on skin endothelial function assessment.
Abraham P; Bourgeau M; Camo M; Humeau-Heurtier A; Durand S; Rousseau P; Mahe G
Microvasc Res; 2013 Jul; 88():56-60. PubMed ID: 23628293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility and methodological issues of skin post-occlusive and thermal hyperemia assessed by single-point laser Doppler flowmetry.
Roustit M; Blaise S; Millet C; Cracowski JL
Microvasc Res; 2010 Mar; 79(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 20064535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-tester and inter-tester reliability of post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia measurement at the hallux.
Barwick A; Lanting S; Chuter V
Microvasc Res; 2015 May; 99():67-71. PubMed ID: 25777076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distance between laser head and skin does not influence skin blood flow values recorded by laser speckle imaging.
Mahé G; Haj-Yassin F; Rousseau P; Humeau A; Durand S; Leftheriotis G; Abraham P
Microvasc Res; 2011 Nov; 82(3):439-42. PubMed ID: 21784084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensibility and specificity of laser speckle contrast imaging according to Endo-PAT index in type 1 diabetes.
Matheus ASM; da Matta MFB; Clemente ELS; Rodrigues MLG; Valença DCT; Gomes MB
Microvasc Res; 2018 May; 117():10-15. PubMed ID: 29203235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cutaneous microvascular functional assessment during exercise: a novel approach using laser speckle contrast imaging.
Mahe G; Abraham P; Le Faucheur A; Bruneau A; Humeau-Heurtier A; Durand S
Pflugers Arch; 2013 Apr; 465(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 23328863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acetylcholine chloride as a potential source of variability in the study of cutaneous vascular function in man.
Sauvet F; Mahé G; Chennaoui M; Langrume C; Vasseur M; Abraham P; Leftheriotis G
Microvasc Res; 2011 Sep; 82(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 21601579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
