BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24256352)

  • 1. High percent tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in pathological stage T3a prostate cancer with a negative surgical margin.
    You D; Jeong IG; Song C; Cho YM; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    Int J Urol; 2014 May; 21(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 24256352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage.
    Budäus L; Isbarn H; Eichelberg C; Lughezzani G; Sun M; Perrotte P; Chun FK; Salomon G; Steuber T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Fisch M; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1341-6. PubMed ID: 20723925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
    Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 784 Japanese patients.
    Hashimoto T; Yoshioka K; Nagao G; Nakagami Y; Ohno Y; Horiguchi Y; Namiki K; Nakashima J; Tachibana M
    Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 25339062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome predictors of radical prostatectomy followed by adjuvant androgen deprivation in patients with clinical high risk prostate cancer and pT3 surgical margin positive disease.
    Spahn M; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Kneitz B; Gontero P; Karnes JR; Schubert M; Montorsi F; Scholz CJ; Bader P; van Poppel H; Joniau S;
    J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 22578727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.
    Leite KR; Hartmann C; Reis ST; Viana N; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Anna AC; Nesrallah A; Nesrallah L; Antunes AA; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24856481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
    Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: ten years of follow-up.
    Rouanne M; Rode J; Campeggi A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Salomon L
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 23883410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
    Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
    Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
    San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC
    J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disease recurrence and progression in untreated pathologic stage T3 prostate cancer: selecting the patient for adjuvant therapy.
    Lowe BA; Lieberman SF
    J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1452-6. PubMed ID: 9302141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of prostate cancer tumor volume and percent cancer in prediction of biochemical recurrence and cancer specific survival.
    Chung BI; Tarin TV; Ferrari M; Brooks JD
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 19837617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.