198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24256540)
1. The "research misconception" and the SUPPORT trial: toward evidence-based consensus.
Wilkinson DJ; Gerrand N; Cruz M; Tarnow-Mordi W
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(12):48-50. PubMed ID: 24256540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What are reasonably foreseeable risks?
Resnik DB
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(12):29-30. PubMed ID: 24256530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The weird divergence of ethics and regulation with regard to informed consent.
Lantos JD
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(12):31-3. PubMed ID: 24256531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomization should be disclosed to potential research subjects.
Binik A; Sheehan M
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(12):35-7. PubMed ID: 24256533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk, respect for persons, and informed consent in comparative effectiveness research.
Spellecy R; Leuthner S; Farrell M
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(12):46-8. PubMed ID: 24256539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ensuring transparency: presenting the trade-offs between the research treatment options.
Schreiner MS
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(12):50-2. PubMed ID: 24256541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What should be disclosed to research participants?
Wendler D
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(12):3-8. PubMed ID: 24256522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomization and the transactional framework for informed consent.
Reynolds D; Fleming DA
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 19180385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomization can be risky.
Lott J
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 19180386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding randomization: helpful strategies.
Brody H; Childress AM
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 19180384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Equipoise trumps randomization.
Fox MD; Hellman CM; Jelley MR
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 19180383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The dirty little truth: we want them to understand, but not really..
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 19180381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. To study, perchance to treat.
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 19180382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Equipoise may be in the eye of the beholder.
Moyer A; Floyd AH
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 19180388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. If children understand drawing straws and flipping coins, research participants can understand randomization.
Howick J
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):19-20. PubMed ID: 19180387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Should a clinical trial coordinator blow the whistle?
Brody H
Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2004; 11(1):3, 11. PubMed ID: 15915577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to open peer commentaries on "assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials".
Edwards SJ
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):W1-3. PubMed ID: 21480062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Must research participants understand randomization?
Wendler D
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):3-8. PubMed ID: 19180378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reflections from across the Atlantic on SUPPORT, disclosure, consent, and the need for neonatal research.
Hansen TW
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(12):39-41. PubMed ID: 24256535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The real problem is consent for treatment, not consent for research.
Capron AM
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(12):27-9. PubMed ID: 24256529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
