These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24257284)
1. Scanner and kVp dependence of measured CT numbers in the ACR CT phantom. Cropp RJ; Seslija P; Tso D; Thakur Y J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 14(6):4417. PubMed ID: 24257284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners. Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of commercial extension plates for the ACR CT accreditation phantom. Greene-Donnelly KA; Ogden KM J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):416-420. PubMed ID: 26894348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models. Einstein SA; Rong XJ; Jensen CT; Liu X J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):174-178. PubMed ID: 31859454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of phantom design and material-dependence on repeatability and reproducibility of CT-based radiomics features. Li Y; Reyhan M; Zhang Y; Wang X; Zhou J; Zhang Y; Yue NJ; Nie K Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1648-1659. PubMed ID: 35103332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 100 days with scans of the same Catphan phantom on the same CT scanner. Husby E; Svendsen ED; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):224-231. PubMed ID: 28921910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardizing CT lung density measure across scanner manufacturers. Chen-Mayer HH; Fuld MK; Hoppel B; Judy PF; Sieren JP; Guo J; Lynch DA; Possolo A; Fain SB Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):974-985. PubMed ID: 28060414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions. Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical Note: Proof of concept for radiomics-based quality assurance for computed tomography. Branco LRF; Ger RB; Mackin DS; Zhou S; Court LE; Layman RR J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):199-205. PubMed ID: 31609076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The automated measurement of CT number linearity using an ACR accreditation phantom. Anam C; Amilia R; Naufal A; Budi WS; Maya AT; Dougherty G Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Dec; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 36541467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of CT parameters on the physical quantities related to image quality for two MDCT scanners using the ACR accreditation phantom: A phantom study. Alikhani B; Jamali L; Raatschen HJ; Wacker F; Werncke T Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):202-210. PubMed ID: 28687287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Birnbaum BA; Hindman N; Lee J; Babb JS Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 17185663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Method for transforming CT images for attenuation correction in PET/CT imaging. Carney JP; Townsend DW; Rappoport V; Bendriem B Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):976-83. PubMed ID: 16696474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the impact of extended field-of-view CT reconstructions on CT values and dosimetric accuracy for radiation therapy. Cheung JP; Shugard E; Mistry N; Pouliot J; Chen J Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):892-901. PubMed ID: 30457170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging. So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitation of clinical feedback on image quality differences between two CT scanner models. Bache ST; Stauduhar PJ; Liu X; Loyer EM; John RX J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 28300384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Image Quality and Dosimetric Performance of CT Simulators. Rezaee M; Letourneau D J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 31176438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo evaluation of CTD(infinity) in infinitely long cylinders of water, polyethylene and PMMA with diameters from 10 mm to 500 mm. Zhou H; Boone JM Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2424-31. PubMed ID: 18649475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations. Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast kVp-switching dual energy contrast-enhanced thorax and cardiac CT: A phantom study on the accuracy of iodine concentration and effective atomic number measurement. Papadakis AE; Damilakis J Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4724-4735. PubMed ID: 28658505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]