These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24257284)

  • 21. In-patient to isocenter KERMA ratios in CT.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Lavallee RL; Roskopf ML; Scalzetti EM
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5362-9. PubMed ID: 21992356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems.
    Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Cheebsumon P; Pengpan T
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 27977415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mathematical modelling of scanner-specific bowtie filters for Monte Carlo CT dosimetry.
    Kramer R; Cassola VF; Andrade ME; de Araújo MW; Brenner DJ; Khoury HJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(3):781-809. PubMed ID: 28072578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study.
    Barca P; Paolicchi F; Aringhieri G; Palmas F; Marfisi D; Fantacci ME; Caramella D; Giannelli M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245374. PubMed ID: 33444367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interphantom and interscanner variations for Hounsfield units--establishment of reference values for HU in a commercial QA phantom.
    Sande EP; Martinsen AC; Hole EO; Olerud HM
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5123-35. PubMed ID: 20714048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners.
    Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Way TW; Larson SC; Christodoulou EG; Kim J
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3006-17. PubMed ID: 16964879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracies of the synthesized monochromatic CT numbers and effective atomic numbers obtained with a rapid kVp switching dual energy CT scanner.
    Goodsitt MM; Christodoulou EG; Larson SC
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2222-32. PubMed ID: 21626956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Design and use of a phantom for testing and comparing the performance of computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems.
    Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Krisanachinda A
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):753-773. PubMed ID: 32303017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
    Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimal acquisition parameter selection for CT simulators in radiation oncology.
    Liu RR; Prado KL; Cody D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 9(4):151-160. PubMed ID: 19020491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
    van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative comparison of noise texture across CT scanners from different manufacturers.
    Solomon JB; Christianson O; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6048-55. PubMed ID: 23039643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigation of the influence of image reconstruction filter and scan parameters on operation of automatic tube current modulation systems for different CT scanners.
    Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Mar; 163(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 25107439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selecting a new computed tomography scanner: things to consider.
    McNitt-Gray MF; Morin RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 17411524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CT number variations due to different image acquisition and reconstruction parameters: a thorax phantom study.
    Groell R; Rienmueller R; Schaffler GJ; Portugaller HR; Graif E; Willfurth P
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2000; 24(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 10767584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Synthetic CT: simulating low dose single and dual energy protocols from a dual energy scan.
    Wang AS; Pelc NJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5551-62. PubMed ID: 21992373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Normalized CT dose index of the CT scanners used in the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Cody DD; Kim HJ; Cagnon CH; Larke FJ; McNitt-Gray MM; Kruger RL; Flynn MJ; Seibert JA; Judy PF; Wu X
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1539-46. PubMed ID: 20489094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantitative assessment of three vendor's metal artifact reduction techniques for CT imaging using a customized phantom.
    Chou R; Li JH; Ying LK; Lin CH; Leung W
    Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2019 Oct; 24(sup2):34-42. PubMed ID: 31502481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dual energy CT for attenuation correction with PET/CT.
    Xia T; Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):012501. PubMed ID: 24387525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Liquid tissue surrogates for X-ray and CT phantom studies.
    FitzGerald PF; Colborn RE; Edic PM; Lambert JW; Bonitatibus PJ; Yeh BM
    Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6251-6260. PubMed ID: 28986933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.