These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1092 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24257672)
1. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA. Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standing radiological analysis with a low-dose biplanar imaging system (EOS system) of the position of the components in total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach: a cohort study of 102 patients. Morvan A; Moreau S; Combourieu B; Pansard E; Marmorat JL; Carlier R; Judet T; Lonjon G Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 26920957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek's safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls. Reina N; Putman S; Desmarchelier R; Sari Ali E; Chiron P; Ollivier M; Jenny JY; Waast D; Mabit C; de Thomasson E; Schwartz C; Oger P; Gayet LE; Migaud H; Ramdane N; Fessy MH; Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):657-661. PubMed ID: 28629942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Highly crosslinked polyethylene wear rates and acetabular component orientation: a minimum ten-year follow-up. Teeter MG; Lanting BA; Naudie DD; McCalden RW; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):891-897. PubMed ID: 29954202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between operative and radiographic acetabular component orientation: which factors influence resultant cup orientation? Grammatopoulos G; Pandit HG; da Assunção R; McLardy-Smith P; De Smet KA; Gill HS; Murray DW Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1290-7. PubMed ID: 25274911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Planning-Assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sariali E; Boukhelifa N; Catonne Y; Pascal Moussellard H J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 26791031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial. Takada R; Jinno T; Miyatake K; Hirao M; Yagishita K; Yoshii T; Okawa A Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 105(5):915-922. PubMed ID: 31204181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Redefining the 3D Topography of the Acetabular Safe Zone: A Multivariable Study Evaluating Prosthetic Hip Stability. Hevesi M; Wyles CC; Rouzrokh P; Erickson BJ; Maradit-Kremers H; Lewallen DG; Taunton MJ; Trousdale RT; Berry DJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Feb; 104(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 34958643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study. Worlicek M; Weber M; Craiovan B; Wörner M; Völlner F; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17():399. PubMed ID: 27646313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinematic alignment versus conventional techniques for total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective case control study. Rivière C; Harman C; Parsons T; Villet L; Cobb J; Maillot C Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 105(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 30930093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation. Kubota Y; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Kataoka M; Tsumura H Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 31522901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study of intra- and post-operative inclination and anteversion angles of acetabular cup in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty]. Tian R; Lei Y; Wang K; Yang P Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1246-1250. PubMed ID: 34651476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acetabular Cup Anteversion and Inclination in Hip Range of Motion to Impingement. McCarthy TF; Alipit V; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Mont MA J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):264-8. PubMed ID: 27067753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular and Femoral Anteversions in Standing Position are Outside the Proposed Safe Zone After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Lazennec JY; Thauront F; Robbins CB; Pour AE J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3550-3556. PubMed ID: 28697862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol. Arora V; Hannan R; Beaver R; Fletcher T; Harvie P Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27826701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femoral anteversion in THA and its lack of correlation with native acetabular anteversion. Bargar WL; Jamali AA; Nejad AH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 19714389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative estimation of femoral anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty using the lesser trochanter. Unlu MC; Kesmezacar H; Kantarci F; Unlu B; Botanlioglu H Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Sep; 131(9):1317-23. PubMed ID: 21359870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between muscular and bony anatomy in native hips: a theoretical background for approach-specific implant positioning. Akgün D; von Roth P; Winkler T; Perka C; Trepczynski A; Preininger B Hip Int; 2019 Mar; 29(2):147-152. PubMed ID: 29756497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]