These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24257676)

  • 1. Accuracy of patient recall of hand and elbow disability on the QuickDASH questionnaire over a two-year period.
    Stepan JG; London DA; Boyer MI; Calfee RP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e176. PubMed ID: 24257676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH.
    Gummesson C; Ward MM; Atroshi I
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 May; 7():44. PubMed ID: 16709254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Shortened Version of the DASH (QuickDASH) in People With Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Galardini L; Coppari A; Pellicciari L; Ugolini A; Piscitelli D; La Porta F; Bravini E; Vercelli S
    Phys Ther; 2024 May; 104(5):. PubMed ID: 38438144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH).
    Franchignoni F; Vercelli S; Giordano A; Sartorio F; Bravini E; Ferriero G
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Jan; 44(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24175606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of the QuickDASH in patients with shoulder-related disorders undergoing surgery.
    Macdermid JC; Khadilkar L; Birmingham TB; Athwal GS
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Jan; 45(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 25394688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can Patients Forecast Their Postoperative Disability and Pain?
    Alokozai A; Eppler SL; Lu LY; Sheikholeslami N; Kamal RN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Mar; 477(3):635-643. PubMed ID: 30762696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The PROMIS physical function correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness.
    Overbeek CL; Nota SP; Jayakumar P; Hageman MG; Ring D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):311-7. PubMed ID: 25099262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance characteristics of the verbal QuickDASH.
    London DA; Stepan JG; Boyer MI; Calfee RP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Jan; 39(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 24268831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire.
    Imaeda T; Toh S; Wada T; Uchiyama S; Okinaga S; Kusunose K; Sawaizumi T;
    J Orthop Sci; 2006 May; 11(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 16721524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What Is the Most Useful Questionnaire for Measurement of Coping Strategies in Response to Nociception?
    Kortlever JT; Janssen SJ; van Berckel MM; Ring D; Vranceanu AM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3511-8. PubMed ID: 26105152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can the QuickDASH PROM be Altered by First Completing the Tasks on the Instrument?
    Shapiro LM; Harris AHS; Eppler SL; Kamal RN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Sep; 477(9):2062-2068. PubMed ID: 31107324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Oxford Elbow Score demonstrated good measurement properties when used with a shortened 7-day recall period.
    Jonsson EÖ; Wänström J; Björnsson Hallgren H; Adolfsson L
    JSES Int; 2023 May; 7(3):499-505. PubMed ID: 37266162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Construct validity, reliability, response rate, and association with disease activity of the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis.
    Ochi K; Iwamoto T; Saito A; Ikari K; Toyama Y; Taniguchi A; Yamanaka H; Momohara S
    Mod Rheumatol; 2015 Mar; 25(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 25065918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the PROMIS and QuickDASH Instruments in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Population.
    Kazmers NH; Qiu Y; Yoo M; Stephens AR; Tyser AR; Zhang Y
    J Hand Surg Am; 2020 May; 45(5):399-407.e6. PubMed ID: 31955997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of QuickDASH at day of surgery versus day of initial consultation: Does informed consent make a difference?
    Ikpeze TC; Childs S; Buckley T; Elfar JC
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018777897. PubMed ID: 29848213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.
    Sorensen AA; Howard D; Tan WH; Ketchersid J; Calfee RP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2013 Apr; 38(4):641-9. PubMed ID: 23481405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving Efficiency of Patient-Reported Outcome Collection: Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing to DASH and QuickDASH Outcome Scores.
    Kane LT; Abboud JA; Plummer OR; Beredjiklian PT
    J Hand Surg Am; 2021 Apr; 46(4):278-286. PubMed ID: 33342614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating Factors Associated With Patient-Perceived Applicability of the QuickDASH Survey in Reflecting Their Goals of Care Prior to Hand Surgery.
    Siebert MJ; Roca H; Maughan G; Monson HW; Kazmers NH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2024 Jan; 49(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 37952144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function.
    Gabel CP; Yelland M; Melloh M; Burkett B
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 Dec; 10():161. PubMed ID: 20021677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Association of an Upper Extremity Functional Survey and Glaucoma Medication Administration Success.
    Hein AM; Rosdahl JA; Bosworth HB; Woolson SL; Olsen MK; Kirshner MA; Muir KW
    Curr Eye Res; 2019 Oct; 44(10):1150-1156. PubMed ID: 31157555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.