These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24258157)

  • 1. Human responses to multiple sources of directional information in virtual crowd evacuations.
    Bode NW; Kemloh Wagoum AU; Codling EA
    J R Soc Interface; 2014 Feb; 11(91):20130904. PubMed ID: 24258157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information use by humans during dynamic route choice in virtual crowd evacuations.
    Bode NW; Kemloh Wagoum AU; Codling EA
    R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Jan; 2(1):140410. PubMed ID: 26064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How Simple Hypothetical-Choice Experiments Can Be Utilized to Learn Humans' Navigational Escape Decisions in Emergencies.
    Haghani M; Sarvi M; Shahhoseini Z; Boltes M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166908. PubMed ID: 27870880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crowd behaviour during high-stress evacuations in an immersive virtual environment.
    Moussaïd M; Kapadia M; Thrash T; Sumner RW; Gross M; Helbing D; Hölscher C
    J R Soc Interface; 2016 Sep; 13(122):. PubMed ID: 27605166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conceptualizing intragroup and intergroup dynamics within a controlled crowd evacuation.
    Elzie T; Frydenlund E; Collins AJ; Robinson RM
    J Emerg Manag; 2015; 13(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 25902294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disentangling the impact of social groups on response times and movement dynamics in evacuations.
    Bode NW; Holl S; Mehner W; Seyfried A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121227. PubMed ID: 25785603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation into the influence of context effects on crowd exit selection under gender difference in indoor evacuation.
    Teng Q; Wang X; He W; Pan G; Mao Y
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1417738. PubMed ID: 39049949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-Organized Crowd Dynamics: Research on Earthquake Emergency Response Patterns of Drill-Trained Individuals Based on GIS and Multi-Agent Systems Methodology.
    Sun H; Hu L; Shou W; Wang J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33672968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Route choice in pedestrians: determinants for initial choices and revising decisions.
    Liao W; Kemloh Wagoum AU; Bode NW
    J R Soc Interface; 2017 Feb; 14(127):. PubMed ID: 28228538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exit choice during evacuation is influenced by both the size and proportion of the egressing crowd.
    Kinateder M; Warren WH
    Physica A; 2021 May; 569():. PubMed ID: 34334928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of large-scale evacuation based on the effectiveness of rescue strategies under different crowd densities.
    Wang J; Lo S; Wang Q; Sun J; Mu H
    Risk Anal; 2013 Aug; 33(8):1553-63. PubMed ID: 23126453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical investigation on safety constraints of merging pedestrian crowd through macroscopic and microscopic analysis.
    Shi X; Ye Z; Shiwakoti N; Tang D; Wang C; Wang W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt B):405-416. PubMed ID: 26519346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing crowd management strategies for the 2010 Love Parade disaster using computer simulations and virtual reality.
    Zhao H; Thrash T; Kapadia M; Wolff K; Hölscher C; Helbing D; Schinazi VR
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Jun; 17(167):20200116. PubMed ID: 32517631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling crowd dynamics through coarse-grained data analysis.
    Motsch S; Moussaïd M; Guillot EG; Moreau M; Pettré J; Theraulaz G; Appert-Rolland C; Degond P
    Math Biosci Eng; 2018 Dec; 15(6):1271-1290. PubMed ID: 30418786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social influence in a virtual tunnel fire--influence of conflicting information on evacuation behavior.
    Kinateder M; Müller M; Jost M; Mühlberger A; Pauli P
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1649-59. PubMed ID: 24947002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drawing power of virtual crowds.
    Jorjafki EM; Sagarin BJ; Butail S
    J R Soc Interface; 2018 Aug; 15(145):. PubMed ID: 30111664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Local interactions underlying collective motion in human crowds.
    Rio KW; Dachner GC; Warren WH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 May; 285(1878):. PubMed ID: 29769363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crowd Simulations and Determining the Critical Density Point of Emergency Situations.
    Khademipour G; Nakhaee N; Anari SMS; Sadeghi M; Ebrahimnejad H; Sheikhbardsiri H
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2017 Dec; 11(6):674-680. PubMed ID: 28554341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing experience in crowds - The participant perspective.
    Filingeri V; Eason K; Waterson P; Haslam R
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):431-441. PubMed ID: 27890155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How people with disabilities influence crowd dynamics of pedestrian movement through bottlenecks.
    Geoerg P; Schumann J; Boltes M; Kinateder M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):14273. PubMed ID: 35995966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.