These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24258458)

  • 1. The effect of interaural fluctuation rate on correlation change discrimination.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Feb; 15(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 24258458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):335-49. PubMed ID: 25618064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation.
    Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1561-72. PubMed ID: 22978885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
    Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binaural unmasking with temporal envelope and fine structure in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Todd AE; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):2982. PubMed ID: 31153315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.
    Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1282-97. PubMed ID: 25786942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of static and dynamic changes in interaural correlation.
    Boehnke SE; Hall SE; Marquardt T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1617-26. PubMed ID: 12398467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Spencer NJ; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1783. PubMed ID: 27914394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
    Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
    Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb C; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2272-87. PubMed ID: 23556595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):306-16. PubMed ID: 1737879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
    Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Untrained listeners experience difficulty detecting interaural correlation changes in narrowband noises.
    Goupell MJ; Barrett ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):EL120-5. PubMed ID: 26233053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaural time discrimination of envelopes carried on high-frequency tones as a function of level and interaural carrier mismatch.
    Blanks DA; Buss E; Grose JH; Fitzpatrick DC; Hall JW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):674-83. PubMed ID: 18596646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaural Pitch-Discrimination Range Effects for Bilateral and Single-Sided-Deafness Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Goupell MJ; Cosentino S; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 20(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 30623318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.