BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24259266)

  • 1. KRAS mutations and CDKN2A promoter methylation show an interactive adverse effect on survival and predict recurrence of rectal cancer.
    Kohonen-Corish MR; Tseung J; Chan C; Currey N; Dent OF; Clarke S; Bokey L; Chapuis PH
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Jun; 134(12):2820-8. PubMed ID: 24259266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinicopathological features of CpG island methylator phenotype-positive colorectal cancer and its adverse prognosis in relation to KRAS/BRAF mutation.
    Lee S; Cho NY; Choi M; Yoo EJ; Kim JH; Kang GH
    Pathol Int; 2008 Feb; 58(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 18199160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TGFBR2 mutation is correlated with CpG island methylator phenotype in microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer.
    Ogino S; Kawasaki T; Ogawa A; Kirkner GJ; Loda M; Fuchs CS
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Apr; 38(4):614-20. PubMed ID: 17270239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Down-regulation of p21 (CDKN1A/CIP1) is inversely associated with microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer.
    Ogino S; Kawasaki T; Kirkner GJ; Ogawa A; Dorfman I; Loda M; Fuchs CS
    J Pathol; 2006 Oct; 210(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 16850502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CpG island methylator phenotype-low (CIMP-low) in colorectal cancer: possible associations with male sex and KRAS mutations.
    Ogino S; Kawasaki T; Kirkner GJ; Loda M; Fuchs CS
    J Mol Diagn; 2006 Nov; 8(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 17065427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microsatellite instability and survival in rectal cancer.
    Samowitz WS; Curtin K; Wolff RK; Tripp SR; Caan BJ; Slattery ML
    Cancer Causes Control; 2009 Nov; 20(9):1763-8. PubMed ID: 19669908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive analysis of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-high, -low, and -negative colorectal cancers based on protein marker expression and molecular features.
    Zlobec I; Bihl M; Foerster A; Rufle A; Lugli A
    J Pathol; 2011 Nov; 225(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 21660972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rectal cancer profiling identifies distinct subtypes in India based on age at onset, genetic, epigenetic and clinicopathological characteristics.
    Laskar RS; Ghosh SK; Talukdar FR
    Mol Carcinog; 2015 Dec; 54(12):1786-95. PubMed ID: 25418895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Associations between colorectal cancer molecular markers and pathways with clinicopathologic features in older women.
    Samadder NJ; Vierkant RA; Tillmans LS; Wang AH; Weisenberger DJ; Laird PW; Lynch CF; Anderson KE; French AJ; Haile RW; Potter JD; Slager SL; Smyrk TC; Thibodeau SN; Cerhan JR; Limburg PJ
    Gastroenterology; 2013 Aug; 145(2):348-56.e1-2. PubMed ID: 23665275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cytoplasmic localization of p27 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B/KIP1) in colorectal cancer: inverse correlations with nuclear p27 loss, microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype.
    Ogino S; Kawasaki T; Ogawa A; Kirkner GJ; Loda M; Fuchs CS
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Apr; 38(4):585-92. PubMed ID: 17239930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic implication of the CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancers depends on tumour location.
    Bae JM; Kim JH; Cho NY; Kim TY; Kang GH
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Aug; 109(4):1004-12. PubMed ID: 23900220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel application of structural equation modeling to correlation structure analysis of CpG island methylation in colorectal cancer.
    Tanaka N; Huttenhower C; Nosho K; Baba Y; Shima K; Quackenbush J; Haigis KM; Giovannucci E; Fuchs CS; Ogino S
    Am J Pathol; 2010 Dec; 177(6):2731-40. PubMed ID: 21037082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancers: comparison of the new and classic CpG island methylator phenotype marker panels.
    Lee S; Cho NY; Yoo EJ; Kim JH; Kang GH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 132(10):1657-65. PubMed ID: 18834226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Promoter methylation of specific genes is associated with the phenotype and progression of colorectal adenocarcinomas.
    Kim JC; Choi JS; Roh SA; Cho DH; Kim TW; Kim YS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):1767-76. PubMed ID: 20077021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hypermethylator phenotype in sporadic colon cancer: study on a population-based series of 582 cases.
    Barault L; Charon-Barra C; Jooste V; de la Vega MF; Martin L; Roignot P; Rat P; Bouvier AM; Laurent-Puig P; Faivre J; Chapusot C; Piard F
    Cancer Res; 2008 Oct; 68(20):8541-6. PubMed ID: 18922929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of microsatellite instability, CpG island methylation phenotype, BRAF and KRAS status in serrated polyps and traditional adenomas indicates separate pathways to distinct colorectal carcinoma end points.
    O'Brien MJ; Yang S; Mack C; Xu H; Huang CS; Mulcahy E; Amorosino M; Farraye FA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Dec; 30(12):1491-501. PubMed ID: 17122504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Somatic alterations, metabolizing genes and smoking in rectal cancer.
    Curtin K; Samowitz WS; Wolff RK; Herrick J; Caan BJ; Slattery ML
    Int J Cancer; 2009 Jul; 125(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 19358278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehensive biostatistical analysis of CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer using a large population-based sample.
    Nosho K; Irahara N; Shima K; Kure S; Kirkner GJ; Schernhammer ES; Hazra A; Hunter DJ; Quackenbush J; Spiegelman D; Giovannucci EL; Fuchs CS; Ogino S
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(11):e3698. PubMed ID: 19002263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mutations in both KRAS and BRAF may contribute to the methylator phenotype in colon cancer.
    Nagasaka T; Koi M; Kloor M; Gebert J; Vilkin A; Nishida N; Shin SK; Sasamoto H; Tanaka N; Matsubara N; Boland CR; Goel A
    Gastroenterology; 2008 Jun; 134(7):1950-60, 1960.e1. PubMed ID: 18435933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Divergent oncogenic changes influence survival differences between colon and rectal adenocarcinomas.
    Kalady MF; Sanchez JA; Manilich E; Hammel J; Casey G; Church JM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Jun; 52(6):1039-45. PubMed ID: 19581844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.