These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24259289)

  • 1. A double-slit experiment for non-classical interference effects in decision making.
    La Mura P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 24259289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open parallel cooperative and competitive decision processes: a potential provenance for quantum probability decision models.
    Fuss IG; Navarro DJ
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):818-43. PubMed ID: 24019237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantum random walks and decision making.
    Shankar KH
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 24482330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychological 'double-slit experiment' in decision making: Quantum versus classical.
    Rashkovskiy S; Khrennikov A
    Biosystems; 2020 Jul; 195():104171. PubMed ID: 32485348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward a physical theory of quantum cognition.
    Takahashi T
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 24482329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantum-like model of brain's functioning: decision making from decoherence.
    Asano M; Ohya M; Tanaka Y; Basieva I; Khrennikov A
    J Theor Biol; 2011 Jul; 281(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 21554890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantum nature of consciousness - Double slit diffraction experiment in medicine.
    Vujanac A; Srejovic I; Zivkovic V; Jeremic N; Jeremic J; Bolevich S; Bolevich S; Jakovljevic V
    Med Hypotheses; 2019 Dec; 133():109382. PubMed ID: 31470243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditions for quantum interference in cognitive sciences.
    Yukalov VI; Sornette D
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 24259280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Zeno's paradox in decision-making.
    Yearsley JM; Pothos EM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1828):. PubMed ID: 27053743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference effects of categorization on decision making.
    Wang Z; Busemeyer JR
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():133-49. PubMed ID: 26896726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concepts and their dynamics: a quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought.
    Aerts D; Gabora L; Sozzo S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):737-72. PubMed ID: 24039114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):255-74. PubMed ID: 23673021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Double-slit experiment with single wave-driven particles and its relation to quantum mechanics.
    Andersen A; Madsen J; Reichelt C; Rosenlund Ahl S; Lautrup B; Ellegaard C; Levinsen MT; Bohr T
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(1):013006. PubMed ID: 26274269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observation of Young's double-slit interference with the three-photon N00N state.
    Kim YS; Kwon O; Lee SM; Lee JC; Kim H; Choi SK; Park HS; Kim YH
    Opt Express; 2011 Dec; 19(25):24957-66. PubMed ID: 22273889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A quantum probability account of order effects in inference.
    Trueblood JS; Busemeyer JR
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(8):1518-52. PubMed ID: 21951058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantum-mechanical machinery for rational decision-making in classical guessing game.
    Bang J; Ryu J; Pawłowski M; Ham BS; Lee J
    Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():21424. PubMed ID: 26875685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interference effects of choice on confidence: Quantum characteristics of evidence accumulation.
    Kvam PD; Pleskac TJ; Yu S; Busemeyer JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Aug; 112(34):10645-50. PubMed ID: 26261322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotion-affected decision making in human simulation.
    Zhao Y; Kang J; Wright DK
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():482-7. PubMed ID: 16817655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Markov versus quantum dynamical models of human decision making.
    Busemeyer JR; Kvam PD; Pleskac TJ
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2020 Jul; 11(4):e1526. PubMed ID: 32107890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Goal-proximity decision-making.
    Veksler VD; Gray WD; Schoelles MJ
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(4):757-74. PubMed ID: 23551486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.