217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24260335)
1. Osteochondral tissue engineering in vivo: a comparative study using layered silk fibroin scaffolds from mulberry and nonmulberry silkworms.
Saha S; Kundu B; Kirkham J; Wood D; Kundu SC; Yang XB
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80004. PubMed ID: 24260335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonmulberry Silk Fibroin Scaffold Shows Superior Osteoconductivity Than Mulberry Silk Fibroin in Calvarial Bone Regeneration.
Sahu N; Baligar P; Midha S; Kundu B; Bhattacharjee M; Mukherjee S; Mukherjee S; Maushart F; Das S; Loparic M; Kundu SC; Ghosh S; Mukhopadhyay A
Adv Healthc Mater; 2015 Aug; 4(11):1709-21. PubMed ID: 26084249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chondrogenic differentiation of rat MSCs on porous scaffolds of silk fibroin/chitosan blends.
Bhardwaj N; Kundu SC
Biomaterials; 2012 Apr; 33(10):2848-57. PubMed ID: 22261099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential of Agarose/Silk Fibroin Blended Hydrogel for in Vitro Cartilage Tissue Engineering.
Singh YP; Bhardwaj N; Mandal BB
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2016 Aug; 8(33):21236-49. PubMed ID: 27459679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Silk fiber reinforcement modulates in vitro chondrogenesis in 3D composite scaffolds.
Singh YP; Adhikary M; Bhardwaj N; Bhunia BK; Mandal BB
Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 12(4):045012. PubMed ID: 28737162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo degradations of silk fibroin scaffolds from mulberry and nonmulberry silkworms.
You R; Xu Y; Liu Y; Li X; Li M
Biomed Mater; 2014 Dec; 10(1):015003. PubMed ID: 25532470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-mulberry silk gland fibroin protein 3-D scaffold for enhanced differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into osteocytes.
Mandal BB; Kundu SC
Acta Biomater; 2009 Sep; 5(7):2579-90. PubMed ID: 19345621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow cells on non-mulberry and mulberry silk gland fibroin 3D scaffolds.
Mandal BB; Kundu SC
Biomaterials; 2009 Oct; 30(28):5019-30. PubMed ID: 19577292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mimicking Hierarchical Complexity of the Osteochondral Interface Using Electrospun Silk-Bioactive Glass Composites.
M JC; Reardon PJ; Konwarh R; Knowles JC; Mandal BB
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2017 Mar; 9(9):8000-8013. PubMed ID: 28181432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The synergistic effects of 3-D porous silk fibroin matrix scaffold properties and hydrodynamic environment in cartilage tissue regeneration.
Wang Y; Bella E; Lee CS; Migliaresi C; Pelcastre L; Schwartz Z; Boyan BD; Motta A
Biomaterials; 2010 Jun; 31(17):4672-81. PubMed ID: 20303584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-mulberry silk fibroin grafted poly (Є-caprolactone)/nano hydroxyapatite nanofibrous scaffold for dual growth factor delivery to promote bone regeneration.
Bhattacharjee P; Naskar D; Maiti TK; Bhattacharya D; Kundu SC
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2016 Jun; 472():16-33. PubMed ID: 26998786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone tissue engineering with premineralized silk scaffolds.
Kim HJ; Kim UJ; Kim HS; Li C; Wada M; Leisk GG; Kaplan DL
Bone; 2008 Jun; 42(6):1226-34. PubMed ID: 18387349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Potential of inherent RGD containing silk fibroin-poly (Є-caprolactone) nanofibrous matrix for bone tissue engineering.
Bhattacharjee P; Kundu B; Naskar D; Kim HW; Bhattacharya D; Maiti TK; Kundu SC
Cell Tissue Res; 2016 Feb; 363(2):525-40. PubMed ID: 26174955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Li C; Vepari C; Jin HJ; Kim HJ; Kaplan DL
Biomaterials; 2006 Jun; 27(16):3115-24. PubMed ID: 16458961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential of 3-D tissue constructs engineered from bovine chondrocytes/silk fibroin-chitosan for in vitro cartilage tissue engineering.
Bhardwaj N; Nguyen QT; Chen AC; Kaplan DL; Sah RL; Kundu SC
Biomaterials; 2011 Sep; 32(25):5773-81. PubMed ID: 21601277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of chondrogenic and osteogenic regulatory factors on composite constructs grown using human mesenchymal stem cells, silk scaffolds and bioreactors.
Augst A; Marolt D; Freed LE; Vepari C; Meinel L; Farley M; Fajardo R; Patel N; Gray M; Kaplan DL; Vunjak-Novakovic G
J R Soc Interface; 2008 Aug; 5(25):929-39. PubMed ID: 18230586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional hepatocyte clusters on bioactive blend silk matrices towards generating bioartificial liver constructs.
Janani G; Nandi SK; Mandal BB
Acta Biomater; 2018 Feb; 67():167-182. PubMed ID: 29223705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual growth factor loaded nonmulberry silk fibroin/carbon nanofiber composite 3D scaffolds for in vitro and in vivo bone regeneration.
Naskar D; Ghosh AK; Mandal M; Das P; Nandi SK; Kundu SC
Biomaterials; 2017 Aug; 136():67-85. PubMed ID: 28521202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of initial cell seeding density on 3D-engineered silk fibroin scaffolds for articular cartilage tissue engineering.
Talukdar S; Nguyen QT; Chen AC; Sah RL; Kundu SC
Biomaterials; 2011 Dec; 32(34):8927-37. PubMed ID: 21906805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Silk Fibroin and Peptide Amphiphile-Based Co-Culture Model for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering.
Çakmak S; Çakmak AS; Kaplan DL; Gümüşderelioğlu M
Macromol Biosci; 2016 Aug; 16(8):1212-26. PubMed ID: 27139244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
