These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24260448)
1. Utility and necessity of repeat testing of critical values in the clinical chemistry laboratory. Niu A; Yan X; Wang L; Min Y; Hu C PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80663. PubMed ID: 24260448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An examination of the usefulness of repeat testing practices in a large hospital clinical chemistry laboratory. Deetz CO; Nolan DK; Scott MG Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jan; 137(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22180474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of repeat testing of critical values: a Q-probes analysis of 86 clinical laboratories. Lehman CM; Howanitz PJ; Souers R; Karcher DS Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jun; 138(6):788-93. PubMed ID: 24878017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of repeat-testing of common chemistry analytes at critical concentrations. Onyenekwu CP; Hudson CL; Zemlin AE; Erasmus RT Clin Chem Lab Med; 2014 Dec; 52(12):1739-45. PubMed ID: 24940715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does routine repeat testing of critical laboratory values improve their accuracy? Baradaran Motie P; Zare-Mirzaie A; Shayanfar N; Kadivar M Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2015; 29():176. PubMed ID: 26034729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study in 623 institutions. Howanitz PJ; Steindel SJ; Heard NV Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 Jun; 126(6):663-9. PubMed ID: 12033953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does routine repeat testing of critical values offer any advantage over single testing? Toll AD; Liu JM; Gulati G; Behling EM; Kocher WD Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 135(4):440-4. PubMed ID: 21466359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Necessity of Routine Repeat Testing of Critical Values in Various Working Shifts. Saffar H; Abdollahi A; Hosseini AS; Torabi Farsani M; Hajinasrollah G; Mohaghegh P Iran J Pathol; 2020; 15(3):161-166. PubMed ID: 32754210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Termination of Repeat Testing in Chemical Laboratories Based on Practice Guidelines: Examining the Effect of Rule-Based Repeat Testing in a Transplantation Center. Soleimani N; Azadi A; Esmaeili MJ; Ghodsi F; Ghahramani R; Hafezi A; Hosseyni T; Arabzadeh A; Khajeh S; Farhadi M; Mohammadzadeh S J Anal Methods Chem; 2021; 2021():9955990. PubMed ID: 34055449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating laboratory key performance using quality indicators in Alexandria University Hospital Clinical Chemistry Laboratories. Rizk MM; Zaki A; Hossam N; Aboul-Ela Y J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 2014 Dec; 89(3):105-13. PubMed ID: 25534174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unnecessary repeated total cholesterol tests in biochemistry laboratory. Demir S; Zorbozan N; Basak E Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2016; 26(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 26981021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Matrix effects on proficiency testing materials. Impact on accuracy of cholesterol measurement in laboratories in the nation's largest hospital system. Naito HK; Kwak YS; Hartfiel JL; Park JK; Travers EM; Myers GL; Ross JW; Eckfeldt JH; Hartmann AE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 8466396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal quality control, proficiency testing, and the clinical relevance of laboratory testing. Kafka MT Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 3355347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External quality assurance in Malaysia. Nawawi H; Lim HH; Zakiah I Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():39-45. PubMed ID: 10926257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should we customise critical value procedure according to patient origin and laboratory turnaround time? Salinas M; López-Garrigós M; Gutiérrez M; Lugo J; Flors L; Leiva-Salinas C J Clin Pathol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 23372177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survey on common reference intervals for general chemistry analytes in Hong Kong. Chan TCH; Mak CM; Chen SPL; Leung MT; Cheung HN; Leung DCW; Lee HK; Koo EC; Lo YC Hong Kong Med J; 2019 Aug; 25(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 31402339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods. Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals. Novis DA; Jones BA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Descriptive analytical data and consequences for calculation of common reference intervals in the Nordic Reference Interval Project 2000. Rustad P; Felding P; Lahti A; Hyltoft Petersen P Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(4):343-70. PubMed ID: 15223700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical limits for urgent clinician notification at US medical centers. Kost GJ JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(5):704-7. PubMed ID: 2296127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]