157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24261049)
1. Modeling the relationship between propagule pressure and invasion risk to inform policy and management.
Wonham MJ; Byers JE; Grosholz ED; Leung B
Ecol Appl; 2013 Oct; 23(7):1691-706. PubMed ID: 24261049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding the biological invasion risk posed by the global wildlife trade: propagule pressure drives the introduction and establishment of Nearctic turtles.
García-Díaz P; Ross JV; Ayres C; Cassey P
Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Mar; 21(3):1078-91. PubMed ID: 25363272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How many founders for a biological invasion? Predicting introduction outcomes from propagule pressure.
Britton JR; Gozlan RE
Ecology; 2013 Nov; 94(11):2558-66. PubMed ID: 24400507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supply-side invasion ecology: characterizing propagule pressure in coastal ecosystems.
Verling E; Ruiz GM; Smith LD; Galil B; Miller AW; Murphy KR
Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Jun; 272(1569):1249-56. PubMed ID: 16024389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissecting the null model for biological invasions: A meta-analysis of the propagule pressure effect.
Cassey P; Delean S; Lockwood JL; Sadowski JS; Blackburn TM
PLoS Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(4):e2005987. PubMed ID: 29684017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Climate change and biological invasions: evidence, expectations, and response options.
Hulme PE
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Aug; 92(3):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 27241717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approaches to setting organism-based ballast water discharge standards.
Henry L; Reusser DA; Frazier M
Ecol Appl; 2013 Mar; 23(2):301-10. PubMed ID: 23634582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-native species spread in a complex network: the interaction of global transport and local population dynamics determines invasion success.
Seebens H; Briski E; Ghabooli S; Shiganova T; MacIsaac HJ; Blasius B
Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Apr; 286(1901):20190036. PubMed ID: 31014215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biotic resistance shapes the influence of propagule pressure on invasion success in bacterial communities.
Jones ML; Ramoneda J; Rivett DW; Bell T
Ecology; 2017 Jul; 98(7):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 28397255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interactions between abiotic constraint, propagule pressure, and biotic resistance regulate plant invasion.
Byun C; de Blois S; Brisson J
Oecologia; 2015 May; 178(1):285-96. PubMed ID: 25543850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamics of an experimental microbial invasion.
Acosta F; Zamor RM; Najar FZ; Roe BA; Hambright KD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(37):11594-9. PubMed ID: 26324928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of the human footprint in shaping the global distribution of terrestrial, freshwater and marine invaders.
Gallardo B; Zieritz A; Aldridge DC
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125801. PubMed ID: 26018575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal modelling of ballast water discharge and ship-mediated invasion risk to Australia.
Cope RC; Prowse TA; Ross JV; Wittmann TA; Cassey P
R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Apr; 2(4):150039. PubMed ID: 26064643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geographic variation in marine invasions among large estuaries: effects of ships and time.
Ruiz GM; Fofonoff PW; Ashton G; Minton MS; Miller AW
Ecol Appl; 2013 Mar; 23(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 23634583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modelling the introduction and spread of non-native species: international trade and climate change drive ragweed invasion.
Chapman DS; Makra L; Albertini R; Bonini M; Páldy A; Rodinkova V; Šikoparija B; Weryszko-Chmielewska E; Bullock JM
Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Sep; 22(9):3067-79. PubMed ID: 26748862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Duration of propagule pressure affects non-native plant species abundances.
De Jong GL; Fowler NL
Am J Bot; 2018 Feb; 105(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 29578298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using Network Theory to Understand and Predict Biological Invasions.
Frost CM; Allen WJ; Courchamp F; Jeschke JM; Saul WC; Wardle DA
Trends Ecol Evol; 2019 Sep; 34(9):831-843. PubMed ID: 31155422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between propagule pressure and colonization pressure in invasion ecology: a test with ships' ballast.
Briski E; Bailey SA; Casas-Monroy O; DiBacco C; Kaczmarska I; Levings C; MacGillivary ML; McKindsey CW; Nasmith LE; Parenteau M; Piercey GE; Rochon A; Roy S; Simard N; Villac MC; Weise AM; MacIsaac HJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 279(1740):2990-7. PubMed ID: 22456877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Per capita invasion probabilities: an empirical model to predict rates of invasion via ballast water.
Reusser DA; Lee H; Frazier M; Ruiz GM; Fofonoff PW; Minton MS; Miller AW
Ecol Appl; 2013 Mar; 23(2):321-30. PubMed ID: 23634584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A population model for predicting the successful establishment of introduced bird species.
Cassey P; Prowse TA; Blackburn TM
Oecologia; 2014 May; 175(1):417-28. PubMed ID: 24566638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
