447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24261318)
1. ER and PR immunohistochemistry and HER2 FISH versus oncotype DX: implications for breast cancer treatment.
Park MM; Ebel JJ; Zhao W; Zynger DL
Breast J; 2014; 20(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 24261318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing breast biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry and FISH studies and Oncotype DX testing, a study of 610 cases.
Neely C; You S; Mendoza PM; Aneja R; Sahin AA; Li X
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):889-893. PubMed ID: 30230095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) of prognostic value once HER2-positive and. low-ER expression patients are removed?
Milburn M; Rosman M; Mylander C; Tafra L
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 23701403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concordance of breast cancer biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization and Oncotype DX qRT-PCR with investigation of discordance, a study of 591 cases.
Sechrist H; Glasgow A; Bomeisl P; Gilmore H; Harbhajanka A
Hum Pathol; 2020 Oct; 104():54-65. PubMed ID: 32758491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. HER2 equivocal breast cancer that is positive by alternative probe HER2 FISH are classified as HER2 negative by Oncotype DX.
Tozbikian GH; Zynger DL
Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):535-540. PubMed ID: 29498449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between HER2 determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of the oncotype DX test.
Dvorak L; Dolan M; Fink J; Varghese L; Henriksen J; Gulbahce HE
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2013 May; 21(3):196-9. PubMed ID: 22914611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assessment in a case-control study: comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction performed by central laboratories.
Baehner FL; Achacoso N; Maddala T; Shak S; Quesenberry CP; Goldstein LC; Gown AM; Habel LA
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Oct; 28(28):4300-6. PubMed ID: 20697093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in the fine needle aspirates of metastatic breast carcinomas.
Monaco SE; Wu Y; Teot LA; Cai G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 22045649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Estrogen receptors, Progesterone receptors and HER2-neu immunohistochemistry results in breast cancer with those of Oncotype Dx.
Sughayer MA; Alhassoon S; Sughayer HM
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Aug; 47():151556. PubMed ID: 32592992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of Oncotype DX and TAILORx risk categories using histopathological and immunohistochemical markers by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.
Ingoldsby H; Webber M; Wall D; Scarrott C; Newell J; Callagy G
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):879-86. PubMed ID: 23643806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer FNA cell blocks and paired histologic specimens: A large retrospective study.
Vohra P; Buelow B; Chen YY; Serrano M; Vohra MS; Berry A; Ljung BM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Nov; 124(11):828-835. PubMed ID: 27315045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of HER2/neu Status by Immunohistochemistry Using Computer-Based Image Analysis and Correlation With Gene Amplification by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay: A 10-Year Experience and Impact of Test Standardization on Concordance Rate.
Sarode VR; Xiang QD; Christie A; Collins R; Rao R; Leitch AM; Euhus D; Haley B
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Jul; 139(7):922-8. PubMed ID: 26125432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing Oncotype DX use in the management of early breast cancer: a single centre experience.
Zhu X; Dent S; Paquet L; Zhang T; Graham N; Song X
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Oct; 50(15):2544-9. PubMed ID: 25129366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines.
McLemore LE; Albarracin CT; Gruschkus SK; Bassett RL; Wu Y; Dhamne S; Yim I; Lin K; Bedrosian I; Sneige N; Chen H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 May; 187(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33813685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with fluorescence in situ hybridization in determining the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status of breast cancer specimens: a multicenter study of 3,149 Chinese patients.
Han X; Shi Y; Ma L; Lyu Z; Yang H; Yao J; Li J; Li B; Qin Y
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 24438611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor marker phenotype concordance in second primary breast cancer, California, 1999-2004.
Brown M; Bauer K; Pare M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Feb; 120(1):217-27. PubMed ID: 19629680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancers presenting luminal B subtype features show higher discordant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Park S; Park HS; Koo JS; Yang WI; Kim SI; Park BW
Cancer; 2012 Feb; 118(4):914-23. PubMed ID: 21800290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of hormone receptor status and HER2 in cytologic cell blocks from breast cancer using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibodies (SP1, SP2, and SP3).
Nassar A; Cohen C; Siddiqui M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Dec; 37(12):865-70. PubMed ID: 19530101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation and workflow optimization of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing using INFORM HER2 dual-color in situ hybridization.
Lim SJ; Cantillep A; Carpenter PM
Hum Pathol; 2013 Nov; 44(11):2590-6. PubMed ID: 24075600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estrogen-independent proliferation is present in estrogen-receptor HER2-positive primary breast cancer after neoadjuvant letrozole.
Ellis MJ; Tao Y; Young O; White S; Proia AD; Murray J; Renshaw L; Faratian D; Thomas J; Dowsett M; Krause A; Evans DB; Miller WR; Dixon JM
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 24(19):3019-25. PubMed ID: 16754938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
