127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24261471)
1. Efficient logistic regression designs under an imperfect population identifier.
Albert PS; Liu A; Nansel T
Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 24261471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A targeted maximum likelihood estimator for two-stage designs.
Rose S; van der Laan MJ
Int J Biostat; 2011 Mar; 7(1):17. PubMed ID: 21556285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Logistic Regression Models with Unspecified Low Dose-Response Relationships and Experimental Designs for Hormesis Studies.
Kim S; Wand J; Magana-Ramirez C; Fraij J
Risk Anal; 2021 Jan; 41(1):92-109. PubMed ID: 32885437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficient regression calibration for logistic regression in main study/internal validation study designs with an imperfect reference instrument.
Spiegelman D; Carroll RJ; Kipnis V
Stat Med; 2001 Jan; 20(1):139-160. PubMed ID: 11135353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using the likelihood ratio to evaluate allowable total error--an example with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
Åsberg A; Odsæter IH; Carlsen SM; Mikkelsen G
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Aug; 53(9):1459-64. PubMed ID: 25894642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maximum likelihood, multiple imputation and regression calibration for measurement error adjustment.
Messer K; Natarajan L
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6332-50. PubMed ID: 18937275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bias in estimating accuracy of a binary screening test with differential disease verification.
Alonzo TA; Brinton JT; Ringham BM; Glueck DH
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1852-64. PubMed ID: 21495059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence estimation subject to misclassification: the mis-substitution bias and some remedies.
Zhang Z; Liu C; Kim S; Liu A
Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(25):4482-500. PubMed ID: 25043925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Logistic regression with correlated measurement error and misclassification in covariates.
Cao Z; Wong MY; Cheng GH
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):789-805. PubMed ID: 36790894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
Albert PS
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.
Colditz GA
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2010; 50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. PubMed ID: 21132580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of case-cohort designs with binary outcomes: Improving efficiency using whole-cohort auxiliary information.
Noma H; Tanaka S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):691-706. PubMed ID: 25348675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Illustration of 2 Fusion Designs and Estimators.
Cole SR; Edwards JK; Breskin A; Rosin S; Zivich PN; Shook-Sa BE; Hudgens MG
Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 192(3):467-474. PubMed ID: 35388406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the efficiency of two-stage response-adaptive designs.
Dette H; Bornkamp B; Bretz F
Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(10):1646-60. PubMed ID: 22865374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying combined design and analysis procedures in two-stage trials with a binary end point.
Bowden J; Wason J
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3874-84. PubMed ID: 22786815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficient adaptive designs with mid-course sample size adjustment in clinical trials.
Bartroff J; Lai TL
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1593-611. PubMed ID: 18275090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Segmented regression with errors in predictors: semi-parametric and parametric methods.
Küchenhoff H; Carroll RJ
Stat Med; 1997 Jan 15-Feb 15; 16(1-3):169-88. PubMed ID: 9004390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Precision of maximum likelihood estimation in adaptive designs.
Graf AC; Gutjahr G; Brannath W
Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):922-41. PubMed ID: 26459506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ROC curve estimation under test-result-dependent sampling.
Wang X; Ma J; George SL
Biostatistics; 2013 Jan; 14(1):160-72. PubMed ID: 22723502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sequential designs for logistic phase I clinical trials.
Liu G; Rosenberger WF; Haines LM
J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):605-21. PubMed ID: 17037261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
