These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24262383)

  • 1. Species delimitation using Bayes factors: simulations and application to the Sceloporus scalaris species group (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae).
    Grummer JA; Bryson RW; Reeder TW
    Syst Biol; 2014 Mar; 63(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 24262383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phylogenetic and coalescent strategies of species delimitation in snubnose darters (Percidae: Etheostoma).
    Harrington RC; Near TJ
    Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):63-79. PubMed ID: 21828082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accurate model selection of relaxed molecular clocks in bayesian phylogenetics.
    Baele G; Li WL; Drummond AJ; Suchard MA; Lemey P
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Feb; 30(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 23090976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An empirical comparison of character-based and coalescent-based approaches to species delimitation in a young avian complex.
    McKay BD; Mays HL; Wu Y; Li H; Yao CT; Nishiumi I; Zou F
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Oct; 22(19):4943-57. PubMed ID: 24073650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal likelihood estimate comparisons to obtain optimal species delimitations in Silene sect. Cryptoneurae (Caryophyllaceae).
    Aydin Z; Marcussen T; Ertekin AS; Oxelman B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106990. PubMed ID: 25216034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Species delimitation using genome-wide SNP data.
    Leaché AD; Fujita MK; Minin VN; Bouckaert RR
    Syst Biol; 2014 Jul; 63(4):534-42. PubMed ID: 24627183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved reversible jump algorithms for Bayesian species delimitation.
    Rannala B; Yang Z
    Genetics; 2013 May; 194(1):245-53. PubMed ID: 23502678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genealogical Working Distributions for Bayesian Model Testing with Phylogenetic Uncertainty.
    Baele G; Lemey P; Suchard MA
    Syst Biol; 2016 Mar; 65(2):250-64. PubMed ID: 26526428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the accuracy of demographic and molecular clock model comparison while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty.
    Baele G; Lemey P; Bedford T; Rambaut A; Suchard MA; Alekseyenko AV
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Sep; 29(9):2157-67. PubMed ID: 22403239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Species delimitation with ABC and other coalescent-based methods: a test of accuracy with simulations and an empirical example with lizards of the Liolaemus darwinii complex (Squamata: Liolaemidae).
    Camargo A; Morando M; Avila LJ; Sites JW
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2834-49. PubMed ID: 22946806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Algorithmic improvements to species delimitation and phylogeny estimation under the multispecies coalescent.
    Jones G
    J Math Biol; 2017 Jan; 74(1-2):447-467. PubMed ID: 27287395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving marginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection.
    Xie W; Lewis PO; Fan Y; Kuo L; Chen MH
    Syst Biol; 2011 Mar; 60(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 21187451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved harmonic mean estimator for phylogenetic model evidence.
    Arima S; Tardella L
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):418-38. PubMed ID: 22414153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Make the most of your samples: Bayes factor estimators for high-dimensional models of sequence evolution.
    Baele G; Lemey P; Vansteelandt S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():85. PubMed ID: 23497171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a bayesian coalescent method of species delimitation.
    Zhang C; Zhang DX; Zhu T; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):747-61. PubMed ID: 21876212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence.
    Alfaro ME; Zoller S; Lutzoni F
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Feb; 20(2):255-66. PubMed ID: 12598693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phylogenetic estimation error can decrease the accuracy of species delimitation: a Bayesian implementation of the general mixed Yule-coalescent model.
    Reid NM; Carstens BC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2012 Oct; 12():196. PubMed ID: 23031350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choosing among partition models in Bayesian phylogenetics.
    Fan Y; Wu R; Chen MH; Kuo L; Lewis PO
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Jan; 28(1):523-32. PubMed ID: 20801907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo.
    Huelsenbeck JP; Larget B; Alfaro ME
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jun; 21(6):1123-33. PubMed ID: 15034130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.