262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24262496)
1. Slow vs rapid delivery rate shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
Salem HK; Fathy H; Elfayoumy H; Aly H; Ghonium A; Mohsen MA; Hegazy Ael R
J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1370-4. PubMed ID: 24262496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy.
Shokeir AA; Sheir KZ; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Eassa W; El-Kappany HA
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):706-10. PubMed ID: 16813924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute.
Ng CF; Lo AK; Lee KW; Wong KT; Chung WY; Gohel D
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):837-42. PubMed ID: 22819406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study.
Madbouly K; El-Tiraifi AM; Seida M; El-Faqih SR; Atassi R; Talic RF
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 15592053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Phyllanthus niruri affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones? A randomized, prospective, long-term study.
Micali S; Sighinolfi MC; Celia A; De Stefani S; Grande M; Cicero AF; Bianchi G
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1020-2. PubMed ID: 16890682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is Tamsulosin Effective after Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Pediatric Renal Stones? A Randomized, Controlled Study.
Shahat A; Elderwy A; Safwat AS; Abdelkawi IF; Reda A; Abdelsalam Y; Sayed M; Hammouda H
J Urol; 2016 Apr; 195(4 Pt 2):1284-8. PubMed ID: 26926538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi.
Davenport K; Minervini A; Keoghane S; Parkin J; Keeley FX; Timoney AG
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2055-8; discussion 2058. PubMed ID: 17070254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial.
Pace KT; Ghiculete D; Harju M; Honey RJ;
J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):595-9. PubMed ID: 16006908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study.
Yilmaz E; Batislam E; Basar M; Tuglu D; Mert C; Basar H
Urology; 2005 Dec; 66(6):1160-4. PubMed ID: 16360432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.
Obek C; Onal B; Kantay K; Kalkan M; Yalçin V; Oner A; Solok V; Tansu N
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085. PubMed ID: 11696710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones.
Honey RJ; Schuler TD; Ghiculete D; Pace KT;
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1418-23. PubMed ID: 19683303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Delivery Rates Achieves Excellent Outcomes for Ureteral Stones: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
Nguyen DP; Hnilicka S; Kiss B; Seiler R; Thalmann GN; Roth B
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 25661296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of transureteral and shock wave lithotripsy--which is the best minimally invasive modality to treat distal ureteral calculi in children?
Basiri A; Zare S; Tabibi A; Sharifiaghdas F; Aminsharifi A; Mousavi-Bahar SH; Ahmadnia H
J Urol; 2010 Sep; 184(3):1106-9. PubMed ID: 20650490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.
Onal B; Demirkesen O; Tansu N; Kalkan M; Altintaş R; Yalçin V
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 15311043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for renal stones >25 mm in children.
Shouman AM; Ziada AM; Ghoneim IA; Morsi HA
Urology; 2009 Jul; 74(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 19428070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: equivalent clearance rates to adults is achieved with fewer and lower energy shock waves.
Kurien A; Symons S; Manohar T; Desai M
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 18727616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of intracalyceal distribution on the clearance of renal stones of > or = 20 mm in children after extracorporeal lithotripsy.
Ather MH; Noor MA; Akhtar S
BJU Int; 2004 Apr; 93(6):827-9. PubMed ID: 15049998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations.
Demirkesen O; Onal B; Tansu N; Altintaş R; Yalçin V; Oner A
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):170-4; discussion 174-5. PubMed ID: 16413356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment efficacy and outcomes using a third generation shockwave lithotripter.
Neisius A; Wöllner J; Thomas C; Roos FC; Brenner W; Hampel C; Preminger GM; Thüroff JW; Gillitzer R
BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):972-81. PubMed ID: 24118958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
