These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24262768)

  • 1. Clinical practice guidelines: potential misconceptions of the GRADE approach.
    Watine J; Wils J; Augereau C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 67(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 24262768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceived disagreement (mostly) not confirmed by evidence... A reply to Watine et al.: Clinical practice guidelines: myths and misconceptions.
    Kunz R; Schunemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 67(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 24262769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.
    Atkins D; Eccles M; Flottorp S; Guyatt GH; Henry D; Hill S; Liberati A; O'Connell D; Oxman AD; Phillips B; Schünemann H; Edejer TT; Vist GE; Williams JW;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 4(1):38. PubMed ID: 15615589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.
    Brożek JL; Akl EA; Compalati E; Kreis J; Terracciano L; Fiocchi A; Ueffing E; Andrews J; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl JJ; Lang DM; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lethaby A; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Watine J; Afilalo M; Welch V; Montedori A; Abraha I; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2011 May; 66(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 21241318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach.
    Neumann I; Santesso N; Akl EA; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Alonso-Coello P; Agoritsas T; Mustafa RA; Alexander PE; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():45-55. PubMed ID: 26772609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Guidelines are made more transparent with the GRADE method: considerations for recommendations are explicit in the new method].
    Boluyt N; Rottier BL; Langendam MW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(25):A4379. PubMed ID: 22748366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT.
    Schünemann HJ; Wiercioch W; Brozek J; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Mustafa RA; Manja V; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Falavigna M; Alhazzani W; Santesso N; Zhang Y; Meerpohl JJ; Morgan RL; Rochwerg B; Darzi A; Rojas MX; Carrasco-Labra A; Adi Y; AlRayees Z; Riva J; Bollig C; Moore A; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Cuello C; Waziry R; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():101-110. PubMed ID: 27713072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The GRADE System. An international approach to standardize the graduation of evidence and recommendations in guidelines].
    Kunz R; Burnand B; Schünemann HJ;
    Internist (Berl); 2008 Jun; 49(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 18461295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overview of methodology for lung cancer evidence review and guideline development.
    McCrory DC; Colice GL; Lewis SZ; Alberts WM; Parker S
    Chest; 2003 Jan; 123(1 Suppl):3S-6S. PubMed ID: 12527561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations].
    Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kien C; Langer G; Wipplinger J; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(7):413-20. PubMed ID: 25444300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The GRADE system: a change in the way of assessing the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations].
    Neumann I; Pantoja T; Peñaloza B; Cifuentes L; Rada G
    Rev Med Chil; 2014 May; 142(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 25427021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.
    Brozek JL; Akl EA; Alonso-Coello P; Lang D; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lelgemann M; Lethaby A; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2009 May; 64(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 19210357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determinants Used to Justify the Strength of Recommendations among Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Shin ES; Jang JE; Yeon JY; Kim DS; Chang SG; Lee YS
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 33(8):e79. PubMed ID: 29441759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [GRADE: Using evidence to decision frameworks for adoption, adaptation and de novo generation of trustworthy guideline recommendations - GRADE-ADOLOPMENT].
    Kallenbach M; Conrad S; Hoffmann F; Matthias K; Gartlehner G; Langer G; Meerpohl J
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2019 Aug; 144-145():90-99. PubMed ID: 31399391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an american college of chest physicians task force.
    Guyatt G; Gutterman D; Baumann MH; Addrizzo-Harris D; Hylek EM; Phillips B; Raskob G; Lewis SZ; Schünemann H
    Chest; 2006 Jan; 129(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 16424429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Helm S; Schultz DM; Datta S; Hirsch JA;
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):E1-33. PubMed ID: 19668280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
    Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Schünemann HJ; Tugwell P; Knottnerus A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 21185693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to use a clinical practice guideline.
    Dahm P; Yeung LL; Gallucci M; Simone G; Schünemann HJ
    J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 19084846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and application of health outcome descriptors facilitated decision-making in the production of practice guidelines.
    Wiercioch W; Nieuwlaat R; Dahm P; Iorio A; Mustafa RA; Neumann I; Rochwerg B; Manja V; Alonso-Coello P; Ortel TL; Santesso N; Vesely SK; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():115-127. PubMed ID: 33992716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Guyatt G; Akl EA; Oxman A; Wilson K; Puhan MA; Wilt T; Gutterman D; Woodhead M; Antman EM; Schünemann HJ;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 23256168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.