These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24263202)

  • 21. Heterogeneity of variance by sire breed, sex, and dam breed in 200- and 365-day weights of beef cattle from a top cross experiment.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Kachman SD
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2579-88. PubMed ID: 8582847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Variance and covariance estimates for weaning weight of Senepol cattle.
    Wright DW; Johnson ZB; Brown CJ; Wildeus S
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Oct; 69(10):3945-51. PubMed ID: 1778806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genetic parameters for nuclear and nonnuclear inheritance in three synthetic lines of beef cattle differing in mature size.
    Northcutt SL; Willham RL; Wilson DE
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4745-53. PubMed ID: 1808171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Parameter estimates for direct and maternal genetic effects on yearling, eighteen-month, and slaughter weights of Korean native cattle.
    Lee JW; Choi SB; Jung YH; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Jun; 78(6):1414-21. PubMed ID: 10875621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On estimation of genetic variance within families using genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing.
    Hill WG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Sep; 45(1):32. PubMed ID: 24007429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variations in morphological and life-history traits under extreme temperatures in Drosophila ananassae.
    Sisodia S; Singh BN
    J Biosci; 2009 Jun; 34(2):263-74. PubMed ID: 19550042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of sire misidentification on sire x year interaction variance and direct-maternal genetic covariance for weaning weight in beef cattle.
    Lee C; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Nov; 75(11):2858-63. PubMed ID: 9374297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CONSTANCY OF POPULATION PARAMETERS FOR LIFE-HISTORY AND FLORAL TRAITS IN RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. II. EFFECTS OF PLANTING DENSITY ON PHENOTYPE AND HERITABILITY ESTIMATES.
    Mazer SJ; Schick CT
    Evolution; 1991 Dec; 45(8):1888-1907. PubMed ID: 28563970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic parameters for resistance against Flavobacterium columnare in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758).
    Wonmongkol P; Sukhavachana S; Ampolsak K; Srisapoome P; Suwanasopee T; Poompuang S
    J Fish Dis; 2018 Feb; 41(2):321-328. PubMed ID: 29064113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Symmetric differences squared and analysis of variance procedures for estimating genetic and environmental variances and covariances for beef cattle weaning weight: I. Comparison via simulation.
    Bruckner CM; Slanger WD
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Dec; 63(6):1779-93. PubMed ID: 3818459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rapid inversion of additive by additive relationship matrices by including sire-dam combination effects.
    VanRaden PM; Hoeschele I
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):570-9. PubMed ID: 2045563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic parameter estimates for preweaning growth traits in Santa Gertrudis cattle.
    Aaron DK; Thrift FA; Parish NR
    J Anim Sci; 1987 Dec; 65(6):1495-9. PubMed ID: 3443570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of reproductive technology to estimate variances and predict effects of gene interactions.
    VanRaden PM; Lawlor TJ; Short TH; Hoeschele I
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Oct; 75(10):2892-901. PubMed ID: 1430491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detection of recombination events, haplotype reconstruction and imputation of sires using half-sib SNP genotypes.
    Ferdosi MH; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JH; Gondro C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):11. PubMed ID: 24495596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sampling bias in estimating Design II variance components with S1 families.
    Jones LP; Compton WA
    Theor Appl Genet; 1985 Jun; 70(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 24252929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Heritability estimates and adjustment factors for the effects of bull age and age of dam on yearling testicular size in breeds of bulls.
    Lunstra DD; Gregory KE; Cundiff LV
    Theriogenology; 1988 Jul; 30(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 16726456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Components of genetic variance and covariance for linear type traits in Jersey cattle.
    Thomas CL; Vinson WE; Pearson RE; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1985 Nov; 68(11):2989-94. PubMed ID: 4078125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of non-additive genetic variances in three synthetic lines of beef cattle using an animal model.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Willham RL; Northcutt SL
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Apr; 73(4):1002-11. PubMed ID: 7628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of ignoring individual heterogeneity in Weibull log-normal sire frailty models.
    Damgaard LH; Korsgaard IR; Simonsen J; Dalsgaard O; Andersen AH
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Jun; 84(6):1338-50. PubMed ID: 16699091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of data structure on genetic (co)variance components of early growth in sheep, estimated using an animal model with maternal effects.
    Maniatis N; Pollott GE
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 12597378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.